Hello, Flatlanderks! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —EncMstr (talk) 06:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked at the DLR Group article again (and edited it some), and I still feel that it is excessively promotional. Therefore, I haven't removed the "advert" template. The lead section is of particular concern. --Orlady (talk) 21:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC) IMO, it's not "on a par" with the other articles you mention on my talk page. A good article about an architecture firm should include more independently-reported content covering the firm's history, notable projects it has designed, etc. Articles that focus on "what it is now and what it offers to clients," like the current version of DLR Group, look remarkably like promotional brochures -- and unlike encyclopedia articles. --Orlady (talk) 21:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
