User talk:Flapjacktastic
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Flapjacktastic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! PhilKnight (talk) 23:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Mikemyers345. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Mikemyers345 (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Mikemyers345: this appears to be a good faith mistaken reversion: as noted in my edit summaries, I cleaned up a category page per policy at WP:CATEGORY. Category pages don't need an intro, and they shouldn't have references or external links. Would you please undo your reversion? Thank you. Flapjacktastic (talk) 21:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]You are welcome
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for opening an SPI here. Last time I complained against this user. Had to rollback a lot of pages. Cheers - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Kittens love socks. So you don't have to. :-) Thanks for the links. Flapjacktastic (talk) 14:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- LOL. For some reason my cat doesn't like socks. :) - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Kittens love socks. So you don't have to. :-) Thanks for the links. Flapjacktastic (talk) 14:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Unreliable source
[edit]Most of the website given in citation now either are referring to the tweet by Taran Adarsh or giving the same box office figures. Taran Adarsh has become a name to reckon with in film trade analysts category. Thanks Rickyurs (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Rickyurs
- Thanks. It's not clear to me from WP:ELPEREN whether that's a RS or not, so I'll leave that judgement to more experienced editors. And as with most of the RS now cited, it's unclear which figures are talking about domestic and which are about overseas, in a subject area that's always problematic on WP for the first few weeks of a film's release. Flapjacktastic (talk) 12:11, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katie Kittermaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
DD Arunprabha
[edit]doesn't meet any criteria for deletion.. all the information is available in public domain and writing language was changed and its a new important channel in North East India. Includents.h (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Includents.h (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's no longer nominated for deletion, because I removed the copyrighted content from the article. Look at the bottom of the two pages linked from the copyvio template: they are both clearly marked as copyright, not public domain. Wikipedia can't legally host copyrighted content. Please don't remove the template again. Flapjacktastic (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epigraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Zee 24 Gantalu
[edit]Can't understand what do you want to say. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zee_24_Gantalu Zee 24 Gantalu channel already shut down and now Zee Keralam channel has been launched, using their licence. So, this page should be issued as Zee Keralam now. And if anything wrong there, you are free to edit them. If possible, add a logo too, because my added all logos have been deleted by Wikipedia. ZaxoteZ (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hello. Since Zee Keralam is a new, separate channel, it should have a separate article, rather than overwrite the old one. Since the new channel Zee Keralam is using Zee 24 Gantalu's license, this should be mentioned in both articles. You're welcome to improve the draft at Draft:Zee Keralam. Thanks, Flapjacktastic (talk) 19:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
As I am new here, don't know how to create a page or how to upload a logo. Please create the page for Zee Keralam. ZaxoteZ (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- There's an excellent guide to creating your first article at Wikipedia:Your first article. Create it at Draft:Zee Keralam, and when you're finished, I can request an administrator to move the draft to Zee Keralam if you like. Flapjacktastic (talk) 19:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Oh my god!!! It's too tough. Just impossible for me. ZaxoteZ (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Done. But I am unable to add a logo. Now, you can request to an Administrator. ZaxoteZ (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
All information including references are given. Now you can request to an Administrator for creating a page for Zee Keralam. ZaxoteZ (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- I've tidied up the draft, and you can hit the "submit" button when it's ready. But it needs more references from WP:Reliable sources to show WP:Notability in my opinion. Best of luck, Flapjacktastic (talk) 20:42, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
I have already submitted the page, but till now it is not available on Wikipedia.
If possible, please add it's logo. You can easily find Zee Keralam logo on internet. ZaxoteZ (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please don't paste copyrighted promotional content to the draft again. It will be removed, because as I explained at your user talk page, Wikipedia is not allowed to host copyrighted work. You need to write it in your own words, and it needs to be written from a WP:Neutral point of view. If you're more comfortable writing in Malayalam or Hindi, there is a Wikipedia in both of those languages, and many others. Flapjacktastic (talk) 06:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Page still not updated on wikipedia. Why? ZaxoteZ (talk) 07:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Add few more information about channel & you are requested to check the page kindly at once. My English is not too strong. If need correction somewhere, please modify it. & Kindly upload the page in Wikipedia.
One more request, I don't know how to upload logo here. So, if possible, kindly add a logo of Zee Keralam channel. ZaxoteZ (talk) 08:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- The notice at the bottom of the draft explains that review of the draft will take time. I can't make it happen any faster. Flapjacktastic (talk) 08:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Bro,one request, please add a channel logo on that page please. ZaxoteZ (talk) 11:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Creation a page for Star Suvarna
[edit]Star Suvarna, a popular Kannada language entertainment channel from Star Network in India, is unavailable in Wikipedia. I want to create a page for Star Suvarna. Can you help me how will I create the page and where I will start to write the description of this channel? ZaxoteZ (talk) 02:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- You can use the WP:Article wizard. Flapjacktastic (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
There are two pages for a single channel in Wikipedia. One is for its SD version, another for its HD version, while one page is enough. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cineplex_HD https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishtey_Cineplex Can I use Cineplex HD page for converting it as Star Suvarna channel? I can add all needed information, you just issue the page as Star Suvarna from current Cineplex HD. ZaxoteZ (talk) 06:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Kindly modify the page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Suvarna_(TV_Channel) ZaxoteZ (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Please make the page beautiful & use the table also. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Suvarna_(TV_Channel) ZaxoteZ (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Are Zee Keralam and Star Suvarna both pages deleted? ZaxoteZ (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Star_Suvarna Please make this page better. I have provided all the information related to channel. Please keep all the information on the box as like all channels. And submit for the verification. ZaxoteZ (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Zee Keralam was deleted and protected from re-creation. Star Suvarna was redirected to Star India following repeated addition of unsourced promotional material, mostly copyrighted.
- You can re-create the article at Star Suvarna if you wish, but since you've said above that you find creating articles difficult, you'd be well advised to continue editing the draft, and then ask for it to be merged into the existing redirect when it's of reasonable quality. Otherwise, it will simply be redirected again. I'm not interested in helping edit these though, so please don't make repeated requests here for me to clean up a 2-minute draft or download a logo. Best of luck, Flapjacktastic (talk) 15:07, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Bro, can you please edit this page? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Suvarna_(TV_Channel) Please edit & submit for review ZaxoteZ (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Please edit this page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Star_Suvarna ZaxoteZ (talk) 19:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Please approved the page or send the page to Administrator for approval. Star Suvarna page is in draft now, is not available on Wikipedia as a normal page. Please do something. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Star_Suvarna ZaxoteZ (talk) 12:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Dev Sen
[edit]Looks like the one who made Dev Sen quickly remade it as a article again. (The page was apparently AFD in 2014, but it was for too soon, so I don't know if it is too soon still), but yeah the guy remade it right after you moved it for him. Wgolf (talk) 06:21, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've requested a history merge from draft, and BLP prodded it. I seriously doubt that it would survive a third AFD. Flapjacktastic (talk) 06:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- I just requested a RPP on it. Wgolf (talk) 19:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
With regards to your reverted changes on the page 'Ajanta Hospital & IVF Centre'
[edit]Hi Flapjacktastic,
Please note that Wikipedia shows a spam message on the page mentioned in the subjected and due to this, I need to remove the unwanted links to the website of the organization. Please do not revert the changes.
Thanks
- That's fine, but as I noted at your talk page, your edit summary is the right place to explain that. I see you've now started doing that, thanks. Flapjacktastic (talk) 09:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Wyldecrest Parks
[edit]Hey there. I noticed your recent edits to Wyldecrest Parks along with your CSD A7 nomination. What was the reason for your removal of this? The reason I ask is because the only fairly notable major coverage I can find for the subject is criticism, and these are of tabloids. Much of the non-notable stuff is either local newspapers or blogs/self published sources that look like they lack any reliability. Back in November, I did a major rewrite of the [{Alfie Best]] article and found there's a great deal on Wyldecrest, notable and not so, but near all in criticism. In your opinion, when taking into account CSD WP:A7 as well as WP:CSECTION. CSECTION states: An article dedicated to negative criticism of a topic is usually discouraged because it tends to be a point-of-view fork, which is generally prohibited by the neutral point-of-view policy. If we keep going, it appears we may end up with an entire article of criticism, which like the Alfie Best article, will likely end up being vandalised. What are your thoughts? Thanks. UaMaol (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, and thanks for your work on this. I mistakenly nominated it for A7 before doing a decent check online. It's definitely eligible for an AFD, including for all the reasons you mentioned above, but as it has been covered (briefly) in national newspapers I'm pretty sure it's not eligible for WP:CSD#A7. We might be able to merge the Wyldecrest article to the Best Sr article, but there's not a lot worth merging yet. But whatever the outcome, I agree we need to guard against it turning into an entirely negative article, and apply WP:UNDUE to condense some of the incident paragraphs if necessary. Flapjacktastic (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Zee Keralam
[edit]Please solve the problem in this page. I cant understand why Zee Keralam page has been declined. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zee_Keralam ZaxoteZ (talk) 07:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
One more time
[edit]This is my last attempt. Please tell me why you have created this (second) account. You can do so here, or by e-mail if there are private reasons for your conduct. However, if I do not hear from you within 24 hours, I will have to assume there is no legitimate reason for this account.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- Email sent. Flapjacktastic (talk) 01:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]I dont know, what the problem you have with Zee Keralam and Colors TV article. All the time, you delete both the articles, but why? Any specific reason? Kindly check, few fake pages are existing here like, Zee Nepal, Zee Bollyworld TV, ABP Gujarati etc. Delete those fake pages instead of authentic pages like, Zee Keralam, Colors TV. WikiWiki5678 (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Or is it the rule of Wikipedia, declining authentic pages and accepting fake pages without any questions or reviews? WikiWiki5678 (talk) 17:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
As like, Zee Keralam (an authentic page) had been rejected so many times, after providing all source as well as official website also. But nothing is required for upper mentioned fake pages, even they are happily exist here for so many years. WikiWiki5678 (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
It is bound to realize me that really Wikipedia is not a trustable platform. WikiWiki5678 (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2019 (UTC)