User talk:FkT

Welcome!

Hello FkT! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NMajdan•talk 02:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting help
Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Template:ASUE

Is there a reason you blanked it or was it just for fun? <3 Clamster 02:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTTF Wiki

Perhaps you'll be interested in helping out here? -- Riffsyphon1024 04:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Baxter

I would be 'someone' who turned the page into a 'stub' (which I didn't). The reason was that the page was poorly written, filled with duplicate, incorrect and un-cited information, and in cleaning it up to something that was verifiable, a lot of information had to be dumped. Per my edit summary cleaning up char info, removing speculation - Provide a citation! blending trivia into char info, moving leaving the show to the actor page
Please note: What I 'removed' was the totally unreferenced and speculative 'future appearances' section. I merged all the sub-sections into one concise section. I removed the needless trivia about what episodes she's not in, and put the discussion of why the actor left the show to the actor's page. This was all done carefully and thoughtfully. I can understand wanting to re-add information, but please, do it as a one at a time addition :) -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 20:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert again? Look at that information! There are typos all over the place, much (if not all in some new form) of the information is there. Please review the information. You're not adding anything new, and in fact you revert pulled out information that had been added. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 21:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here, look at the diff report. I merged sections, folded in trivia and took out the speculation, which has no place on Wikipedia. I'm asking you work WITH me. I'm trying to explain what I'm doing and you're just reverting without reading, which is a little rude. Please work with me and discuss this. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 21:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And blanking the talk page would be vandalism. Please stop. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 00:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Two Nice People

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article About Two Nice People, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 18:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Republican (politician) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Republican (politician). Since you had some involvement with the Republican (politician) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 21:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]