User talk:Fjfhgfhdstty

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fjfhgfhdstty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did not mean any harm

Decline reason:

So what did you mean? We are aware that you have at least two blocked accounts, and we will need compelling reasons to unblock either. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fjfhgfhdstty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will amit that I am to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty But I tried to floow the rules on this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Legitimate_uses_of_alternative_accounts and it said to add this User Alt Acct Master. no one explained why I was blocked on this account, so i created another one. also I tryed to do better every time. I desirve an another chance and wil try harder.

Decline reason:

Per below, please log in to the first account you ever used at Wikipedia, and request an unblock there. Jayron32 05:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lies, every word of it. I have personally blocked two other socks off this farm in the last 24 hours. You are not supposed to be editing Wikipedia, you the person behind the accounts, under any name. Any admin considering this request should check out Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Simulation12 and Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Simulation12 before proceeding. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fjfhgfhdstty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please give me an another changce. This is my first account I ever created hear on wikiedia. I went back and checked my fetch edits.I created this account after my ip adreess got blocked.

Decline reason:

Again, this is not your original account. Please make the request from that account. It appears that User:Simulation12 would be that account. Smashville^talk 19:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fjfhgfhdstty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock of User:Simulation12. User:Simulation12 was combined with this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty. Extremeguy,suiteman,and the other ones are part of User:Simulation12. AussieLegend talk | contribs reported me under a new name for what ever reason and incledded User:JimConroy38 who is the sock of User:Simulation12. So you can see this is the main account I created

Decline reason:

This account was confirmed by a checkuser to be affiliated with Simulation12. There's no use denying this, unless I'm misunderstanding your unblock request. Also, please do not make unblock requests to communicate; instead, write what you'd like to say underneath and only make unblock requests from the main account. m.o.p 20:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fjfhgfhdstty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock of User:Simulation12. User:Simulation12 was combined with this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty. Extremeguy,suiteman,and the other ones are part of User:Simulation12. AussieLegend reported me under a new name for what ever reason and incledded User:JimConroy38 who is the sock of User:Simulation12. So you can see this is the main account I created. I do not know why AussieLegend put them in the same case when they are not the same. when Extremeguy was reported I was put under the Simulation12 where I am accutally a sock of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty. Its two seperate caseses. Also I don't even know the password for Simulation12. The are two seperate cases. User:Simulation12 is a sock of Simulation12 Mayme09 Wheeloffortune26 Simulation16 Simulation21 and JimConroy38 and Fjfhgfhdstty witch is my first account is a sock of Ffaadstrwwqweg Fgdsggureugb Ffaadstrbdetete suiteman extremeguy fetchfan88 toughdude meancoip and Bhfkdjktrrerkgf are the only ones I have ever created. please reconsider. Also why don't you look back into the contribs they do not match Simualtion12 They only match edits of Ffaadstrwwqweg Fgdsggureugb Ffaadstrbdetete suiteman extremeguy fetchfan88 toughdude meancoip and Bhfkdjktrrerkgf. They do not have anything to do with Simulation12.

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not a sock of User:Simulation12. User:Simulation12 was combined with this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty. Extremeguy,suiteman,and the other ones are part of User:Simulation12. AussieLegend reported me under a new name for what ever reason and incledded User:JimConroy38 who is the sock of User:Simulation12. So you can see this is the main account I created. I do not know why AussieLegend put them in the same case when they are not the same. when Extremeguy was reported I was put under the Simulation12 where I am accutally a sock of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty. Its two seperate caseses. Also I don't even know the password for Simulation12. The are two seperate cases. User:Simulation12 is a sock of Simulation12 Mayme09 Wheeloffortune26 Simulation16 Simulation21 and JimConroy38 and Fjfhgfhdstty witch is my first account is a sock of Ffaadstrwwqweg Fgdsggureugb Ffaadstrbdetete suiteman extremeguy fetchfan88 toughdude meancoip and Bhfkdjktrrerkgf are the only ones I have ever created. please reconsider. Also why don't you look back into the contribs they do not match Simualtion12 They only match edits of Ffaadstrwwqweg Fgdsggureugb Ffaadstrbdetete suiteman extremeguy fetchfan88 toughdude meancoip and Bhfkdjktrrerkgf. They do not have anything to do with Simulation12."

So you claim that the specific user you were linked to was in error, but that you are running a pletora of sockpuppet accounts, clearly against policy? What's the point? You aren't going to be unblocked because of a clerical error. Your unblock requests have now been declined by several admins, and yet you keep appealing. This is not productive. If you wish to be unblocked, your only recourse now is to contact the Arbitration Committee via email at arbcom-l AT lists.wikimedia.org, or by following the contact instructions noted at WP:ARBCOM. This page has been protected to stop you from repeatedly requesting further unblock requests. --Jayron32 19:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]