User talk:Firekong1

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Firekong1! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quite late to this, but thank you! Firekong1 (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that in this edit to Komodo (island), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

re: Komodo (island)

No worries. It's just that you didn't need to remove the infobox altogether just to remove vandalism. In the future, you should make use of the undo tool in cases like this - although I would advise you to read our policy on vandalism to distinguish what is and is not vandalism. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zebra

Your edits at the zebra weren't great, my friend. Zebras aren't a single species and they are not classified as "vulnerable" by the IUCN. That is for single species. The source you used is a deadlink and seems to be about the plains zebra. I know that the article used to have the status, but that information was inaccurate and it's been updated since.LittleJerry (talk) 13:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please don't add or change content, as you did at Dingo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. William Harris (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do disruptive editing, friend, you might get in trouble.
You would be wise to stop making things up and attributing them under a cited source. Your edits might be construed as subtle vandalism on Wikipedia, even though they're not. William Harris (talk) 04:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your apology, and I understand that you are remorseful and do not understand how Wikipedia works.

Nobody "runs" Wikipedia, it runs itself. There are a set of policies, and there are some very experienced editors who have become Administrators and have been granted powers to enforce those policies. The rest is all done by editors similar to you and I. The people who have visited your talk page and left you messages - including me - are all simply more-experienced editors.

There is a place on Wikipedia where editors specialise in helping new editors, it is called the "Teahouse" and you will find it by clicking on the WP:TEAHOUSE. This is the place for your questions. There is also the WP:HELPDESK for how to edit Wikipedia. I notice that you have an interest in mammals, and there is a project called WP:MAMMALS where you might like to follow discussions and participate in its Talk page. All the best with your future edits; I am here if you get stuck. William Harris (talk) 08:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I note that Firekong1 is now a responsible and well-seasoned editor. William Harris (talk) 10:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Firekong1 (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pediculus schaeffi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pediculus schaeffi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 13:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thank you for notifying me of this. Firekong1 (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

e

What was that about making the first move? Borophagus (talk) 14:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You got me, lol XD Firekong1 (talk) 04:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good news, dog guy has been globally blocked/banned on fandom! :) Firekong1 (talk) 14:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus:I hope we can talk here. Just curious, but do you know why dog guy was blocked/banned on fandom? Firekong1 (talk) 13:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea, lol. Borophagus (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see lol. Hopefully, he'll be gone for good. Firekong1 (talk) 17:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I worry that I might not be able to return on fandom. Firekong1 (talk) 20:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... why? Borophagus (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Because they might permanently remove me for some reason without me knowing. But if that happens, don't talk to the admins for now. Firekong1 (talk) 20:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It won't happen if you just pretend nothing happened. As much as I hate to say it, that's the only way this is gonna work this time. Borophagus (talk) 20:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Of course. I know, thanks.

Btw, did I ever tell you about the time I visited my aunt and cousin in Britain and I had British licorice? Firekong1 (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, but good for you. Liquorice is pog ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Borophagus (talk) 20:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Thanks. I had my first jawbreakers there, and I had licorice shaped like everyday objects. I remember them tasting really funky. I also had jelly babies. Have you ever had jelly babies? Firekong1 (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine not having jelly babies lol, they're like one of the best yet simplest sweets out there Borophagus (talk) 11:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I said I had jelly babies lol. I guess they're your version of sour patch kids. Firekong1 (talk) 14:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know, lol. It's a phrase. And btw, Acrocanthosaurus and Anjanath is Best have asked if they can edit the Gigan and Skullcrawler pages. Should I tell them they can do so? Borophagus (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I see lol

If they don't add any information that's not part of my story, then it's fine. Firekong1 (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: could you tell dragnor that I messaged him on deviantart? Firekong1 (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A'ight. So, uh, dog guy just got has returned. Never mind, they got him!Borophagus (talk) 06:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I know, I saw. What should I do when I return? I may or may not have to explain my side, but I won't engage with him. Firekong1 (talk) 12:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just ignore him. Someone actually reported him for abusing his admin rights on one of his wikis, lmao. Borophagus (talk) 12:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Alright. That's good, lol. I feel like I have to explain my side when I return, but only to you guys, and I won't mention dog guy by name. Should I also bring up that he unfairly blocked me on the wikis that he's an admin on? Firekong1 (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what this guy reported him for, lol. I think it'd be a little risky, though. Borophagus (talk) 13:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know. That's why I'll wait for a few months before I appeal on those wikis. Firekong1 (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A'ight. Borophagus (talk) 13:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yep. I just hope everybody will understand. Firekong1 (talk) 13:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Also, I said they can add to the pages if they don't violate my lore, not if they relate to my lore. Firekong1 (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Borophagus (talk) 17:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s fine, lol. Firekong1 (talk) 17:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Do you know who BhagyaMani is? Firekong1 (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The guy who stopped you adding "Persian leopard" or whatever it was to the name list, right? Borophagus (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yeah. And it's "Iranian Leopard". I was editing one of my comments on the talk page of that article, and he assumed it was vandalism for some reason. Firekong1 (talk) 17:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... well, that's ridiculous, considering people do that all the time. 20:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. It is. But I guess I’ve got to be careful now since people will see everything I do and other do as a harmful offense wherever I go. Firekong1 (talk) 21:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Do you ever feel like you haven't been done justice and wish that you could deal with eejits, but you don't for your own safety? Firekong1 (talk) 23:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... I mean, kinda? Obviously, I don't wanna beat them up so much as systematically ruin their lives until they are little more than a shadow of the person they were.

That was a joke, by the way. Borophagus (talk) 06:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I know lol. But I was just asking if you ever wanted to get back at eejits. Firekong1 (talk) 12:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Are you there? Firekong1 (talk) 16:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Unfortunately I'm engaging with a conspiracy theorist who thinks humans as a species are billions of years old ;-; Borophagus (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Ok. Wait, what? That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard of lmao.

Can you please tell dragnor to mention me on titano's post about the sixth extinction so I can comment on it later? Firekong1 (talk) 16:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's ... it's complicated. I can send you the link if you want, but idk if you'll be able to read it. And I'm pretty sure you've already been pinged. Borophagus (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: What do you mean complicated? Does dragnor not like me anymore? Firekong1 (talk) 17:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I mean the conspiracy theorist thing was complicated lmao. Dragnor still likes you. Borophagus (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Oh, ok lol. I just want dragnor to ping me cuz I feel left out lol. Plz, can you tell him plz. 🥺 Firekong1 (talk) 18:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean I could always ping you lmao, and I'm pretty sure someone else already has, so ... Borophagus (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Please do! I wanna remember you guys lol. Firekong1 (talk) 19:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... we're that forgettable, huh ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Borophagus (talk) 19:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: No, not at all lol. I want you guys to remember me! Firekong1 (talk) 20:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're mentioned so much that I find it highly unlikely. Borophagus (talk) 20:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Alright. Also, did you know that dog guy was suspended from twitter? In the past? Also, I may or may not have my admin status back on the wikis. Firekong1 (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! And no, I didn't know he was yeeted from Twitter lmfao Borophagus (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yeah lol. I dunno if I still have my privileges back on fandom, but I have a theory that I’ll get them back someday soon and carnotaur will as well. Firekong1 (talk) 12:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not on the JP wiki, but she clarified that Carnotaur can have privileges on Dinopedia, so he's a mod (and former admin, because he chose to be demoted because there were so many) there. Borophagus (talk) 14:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Ah ok, but I have no idea if I still have my privileges on my wikis. If not, I suspect that it won’t be permanent and that I’ll somehow get them back again someday. After all, nothing lasts forever, and there is no such thing as permanent in the endless time of the universe. Firekong1 (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but your privilege loss might end in 150 years' time. Borophagus (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Not really. She’ll be 60 in 22 years, so things might change for the better in our favor during that time. Firekong1 (talk) 16:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... did you legit just assume Fandom will still exist in 22 years lol Borophagus (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yeah, I did lol. What’s the problem lol? Won’t it exist then? Y’know she’ll step down by then because she’ll be 60. Firekong1 (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Literally anything could happen in the intervening 22 years. Borophagus (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: My point exactly, but could fandom actually close down?

Also, why can’t carnotaur become a mod again? Was it because of the situation? Firekong1 (talk) 19:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fandom could almost certainly shut down. Because of what happened on the JP Wiki, yeah. He's allowed to on other wikis, though. Borophagus (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I see. Maybe the situation will be better investigated in the future, as will mine and countless others.

In any case, why would fandom shut down? I’m just curious. Firekong1 (talk) 20:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sites don't last forever. Maybe it'll become less popular over time, or maybe there'll be controversy. Borophagus (talk) 20:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yeah, probably. Hopefully she'll be exposed for who she really is. Firekong1 (talk) 20:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully. Borophagus (talk) 12:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yeah. Btw, do you think that we could have the wiki have a google hangouts group in the future and play minecraft and whatnot? Firekong1 (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it, since my Google account IS in my real name, but maybe. Borophagus (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Oh right, I remember lol. But you do realize that you can change your google account name and your youtube name. If you want, that is.

Also, what do you think of me making something like this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3w6uMceBRM Firekong1 (talk) 16:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I might, but idk. I say do it but why the fuck are there random sea creatures lmao, this isn't hell's aquarium Borophagus (talk) 16:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Alright, you do you. I know lol, I guess the person who made it just wanted to use whatever he had lmao. There's even an arthropleura in there. Firekong1 (talk) 16:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AND a Star Wars creature, lol. Borophagus (talk) 16:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yeah I know, the Opee Sea Creature lol.

I'll do one for pre-holocene creatures and one for holocene creatures. Firekong1 (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! Borophagus (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Thanks! Also, have you gotten back to the dinosaur toy blog? Firekong1 (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Np! I have, but I'm barely ever on it. Borophagus (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Ah, alright. And in the future, should anything happen to us, can we have failsafes for us? Firekong1 (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... as in what? Borophagus (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: As in anything unexpected but bad that happens to us and the group, wherever we are. Don't worry, the plans are harmless and safe. Firekong1 (talk) 19:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... no, as in what are the failsafes? Borophagus (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Oh, that. Just evidence that we have in our favor, which we may or may not use against people. Firekong1 (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, all right. I guess so! Borophagus (talk) 20:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Great! Thanks! Firekong1 (talk) 20:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Do you know the english defence league? Firekong1 (talk) 06:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was expecting it to be something relating to sports but what the fuck Borophagus (talk) 13:39, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yeah, wtf indeed.

Btw, I’ve been thinking of becoming stronger to face our enemies in the future. Y’know, kinda like a super soldier. Firekong1 (talk) 14:28, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minus the weaponry, I hope. When in doubt, wage psychological warfare and reduce your enemies to a gibbering wreck. Borophagus (talk) 14:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Precisely! Just like armin did to Reiner and Bertolt!

We won’t use any weapons, but if I have to, I’ll go green goblin and joker when I can. And then, I can use any tactic, move, and even weapon I want and unleash my wrath upon them. 😈 Firekong1 (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperbole is unnecessary, just traumatize them with detailed descriptions of the processes of death, the incomprehensible futility of existence, and our insignificance within the universe we occupy. Borophagus (talk) 16:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Precisely, we will give them mindf*cks, which is why I’m not concerned about blocking and banning in the long run, since they won’t last permanently, as there’s no such thing as forever. Firekong1 (talk) 16:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, but you can be banned for the rest of your life. Not like reincarnation is a thing. Borophagus (talk) 16:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I don’t understand what you’re taking about lol. But my point still stands. The universe won’t last forever, so neither will anything bad occurring to us. That means the block/ban will not outlast past the end of humanity and/or civilization or the end of the universe in 22 billion years time. Firekong1 (talk) 17:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, but you phrased that as if you'd live indefinitely and eventually outlast the ban, lol. And it's gonna be a lot more than 22 billion years, IIRC.

And by the way, Very Inked wanted to know if he could have his bureaucrat rights back on Kaijuverse. Borophagus (talk) 18:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I might, if I consent to an experiment based on prolonging human life, thus granting me longevity, so it’s not out of the question, especially with advanced technology. And blocks/bans won’t last billions of years because websites and humanity will no longer exist by then.

Also, inked can have rights back. Make sure to grant them back to him as soon as you can. Firekong1 (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or such an experiment could result in nothing happening, so ... 🤷‍♂️

And I'll get Inked his rights ASAP. Borophagus (talk) 18:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Ah, I see that you’re not an optimist, brother. Great things can and will happen to us. To quote Newton Geizler “fortune favors the brave, dude”.

Excellent! I hope he can return and help us. Firekong1 (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've said I'm a pessimist like fifty times lol

At least you quoted one of the two objective best characters in Pacific Rim. Borophagus (talk) 19:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: You must only be pessimistic for the fate and destiny of the natural world brother. In regards to humanity, it’ll be somewhat of a mixed bag for the most part.

I know, I find myself quoting fictional characters from time to time, especially characters and franchises I hold dearly. Firekong1 (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... not really, I'm just an overall pessimist ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

I feel like I don't quote fiction anywhere near enough, lol. Borophagus (talk) 19:34, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know you are, I just said that you should be a pessimist for nature, since it’ll be losing the most instead of humanity.

And don’t worry, I can teach you how to quote fiction anytime you want, wherever and whenever you want. Firekong1 (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yeee

And anyways, we got a new member on the wiki! Borophagus (talk) 07:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Nice! Who? And which wiki?

Also, can you ask deltadromeus445 if he has a discord? Firekong1 (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My bad! It's OnionPasta on the Sixth Extinction Wiki. And I'll ask Deltadromeus now. Borophagus (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He says he goes by "eyadthedino". Borophagus (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All right, things are getting heated again with Dinosaurs20, and he sent me a message asking how to demote a bureaucrat. I'm wondering whether to demote him. Borophagus (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: That’s good!

Just demote dinosaurs20. And ask the admin on animal database to demote him as well: https://animals.fandom.com/wiki/User:Birds_Forever?useskin=fandomdesktop Firekong1 (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing me and Titanosaurus80 did both of those ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Borophagus (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yes, very good!

Also, I did some research on dog guy here, and apparently he lives in Birmingham and is in his late 20s to early 30s as he went to the university of Birmingham. He also used his personal talk pages for personal attacks, which is why he got blocked.

That, combined with the sock puppets on here and possibly fandom, may give us leverage against him in the future. But don't worry, I don't plan to do anything with this info for now. Firekong1 (talk) 17:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That could help, but I think you might've gone a bit too in-depth with the age and location? Borophagus (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Well, I'm not sure about his exact age, but since he went to college/university, dog guy is bound to be a grown man. And his location was revealed since he used a university of Birmingham computer as a sock puppet., which indicates that he lives in Birmingham. Firekong1 (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see, lol. Borophagus (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Also, the information of staff from sites like deviantart and fandom is literally available on linkedin lmao. Firekong1 (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh lmao Borophagus (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yeah, that's how I know all about her lmao. But don't worry, I won't share the info. Firekong1 (talk) 20:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good! Borophagus (talk) 20:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: And if anyone is a threat to you and the others, you make sure to tell me and I’ll come and take care of them. 🌝

Also, dog guy got blocked/banned from fandom again! Firekong1 (talk) 13:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Are you there mate? Firekong1 (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YEEEEEE Borophagus (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Dog guy is gone again! This might be his last chance, and if he's gone again he's gonna be gone for good! Firekong1 (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... that's the reason I said "YEEEEEEEEEE" lmao Borophagus (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Ah, ok lol. Here we say "YEAH, BOOOOOOOOIIIIIII".

Btw, what do you usually watch on the telly? Firekong1 (talk) 17:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's barely ever anything on, so it's just Emmerdale, Coronation Street, the odd movie, the odd documentary, and the odd sitcom. Borophagus (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Ah, I see. But what about telly things like downton abbey and sherlock holmes and monty python and benny hill? Firekong1 (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only three of those interest me, but I've only seen Monty Python and a bit of Sherlock Holmes. Borophagus (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I see lol.

Btw, I think I might've found dog guy's pinterest and youtube. There isn't much there tho. Firekong1 (talk) 23:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

epic Borophagus (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yep. At first I had my doubts that it was dog guy, but it’s confirmed to be him by one of his own sock puppets. Firekong1 (talk) 12:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Are you an optimist in any certain aspects? Firekong1 (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not really? Borophagus (talk) 17:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Well, you should be.

Also, titano needs evidence of dinosaurs20 from dinopedia to demote him and block him on animal database. Could you please help him? Firekong1 (talk) 17:39, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw, but I don't really HAVE the evidence. Borophagus (talk) 18:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Then ask dragnor for help and evidence, and he'll provide it for you. Firekong1 (talk) 18:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A'ight. Borophagus (talk) 18:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Titano already asked lol Borophagus (talk) 18:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Ah, very good! But do help him later, he's gonna need it. Firekong1 (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IF he does need it, I will. Borophagus (talk) 19:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Fantastic! But he will need your help. Firekong1 (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... if I have time, then ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°). BirdsForever gave him a week, and Dinosaurs20 has been temporarily demoted. Borophagus (talk) 06:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, uh, be thankful you're not in Dinopedia yet. There was an absolute dipshit who waged war against us after we exposed him for faking a fossil, and now he's taking the battle to wikis he's not blocked on. Borophagus (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Good! Make sure to tell dragnor to give you guys evidence. You guys can also look on dinosaurs20s contributions on that wiki as well, since I've been noticing his poor grammar on articles there as well, so bring that to birdsforever's attention.

I heard, I'm really sorry about the situation. I heard your'e confronting him on his crap. Titano told me, and in turn, I told him to tell you that I have tremendous respect for you and that I see you as a little bro of sorts. Firekong1 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Titano told me, lol. I think I said "YEEEEEEEEE" a few times. Anyways, thanks!. But yeah, that Frostcrush0000 guy's being, and I hate to even write this word, an absolute wanker. First, he started waffling on about this random rock he dubbed Bekesaurus. Then, yesterday, he posted what is quite clearly a cropped Xenotarsosaurus tibia/fibula. Some of us called him out and he started slagging us off, even saying that 12's birth was a mistake. But anyways, I'll contact Dragnor about Dinosaurs20 right now. Borophagus (talk) 14:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, did you miss the part where I told you Titanosaurus80 had already asked Dragnor, and he'd got results already Borophagus (talk) 14:05, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: That's good. Don't give up.

I don't think so lol. Did dragnor give you guys any evidence yet? Did he even respond? Firekong1 (talk) 14:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He already gave Titano the evidence, lol. Borophagus (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: So he’s shooting himself in the foot and you guys don’t even have to lift a finger lmao.

I just hope that birdsforever accepts it, and that dragnor can step in and help. Firekong1 (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaurs20 is currently just countering Titano with bullshit edits consisting of poor grammar and random removals, lmao. Borophagus (talk) 17:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Excellent, even more proof.

Also, please tell birdsforever that I sent her a friend request on discord, and that we must talk there. Firekong1 (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Firekong!

Uh, it's me Duck. I hope I have the right person lol. but uh, yeah, just stopping by I guess. Duckraptor (talk) 18:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You do! And thanks. It’s good to see you here. :) Firekong1 (talk) 18:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some interesting news?

Hello Firekong1, I see that dog guy has been globally blocked/banned across fandom and I have no idea why. All I have to say is that you might be safe from him now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Second Indominus (talk • contribs) 12:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea lol. Thanks bro, that's good news. :)

I hope you're alright btw. Firekong1 (talk) 19:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am , thanks for asking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by එල්ලෝ (talk • contribs) 10:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome. :) Firekong1 (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Second Indominus: Dog guy got banned/blocked again! Firekong1 (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Hey man, I know times are rough for you right now, but just remember, me and the boys are here to help you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duckraptor (talk • contribs) 21:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro, the feeling's mutual. I hope I can help you guys someday. :) Firekong1 (talk) 21:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Idea

@Borophagus: I have an idea: What if I make a comic about you as a powerful and mysterious kakapo themed entity? Your adventures will center primarily around religion, the sixth extinction, and other human related matters. Firekong1 (talk) 23:12, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Le sure ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Borophagus (talk) 06:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Le pog! I'll have a lot of funny moments in there. Firekong1 (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

le poggers Borophagus (talk) 13:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I'm already done with creating your commandments:https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTaJYldd178BE_qb3tXNZ3Ew0AV1fCH92dsAmoxUxpkIrLKAfQk0RbifRSU5S7XCNbjDj3jR1LvuyH2/pub Firekong1 (talk) 16:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeeeeee Borophagus (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

these are some legit moral standards, damn Borophagus (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Yes indeed.

Thanks. Is there anything that I need to change? If there is, let me know. Firekong1 (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose this might be because of how I view the human race overall, but there should be exceptions to the eighth commandment. Some people are just too far-gone for salvation. While I don't really want them to be tortured, I think they kinda forgo their rights. Borophagus (talk) 17:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Alright, I'll change it accordingly. Firekong1 (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yee Borophagus (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Lol

I dunno when to start drawing everything tho. Firekong1 (talk) 19:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Borophagus (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Ok. I shall do my best. And I'll try to draw you as a human as well. Also, there'll be other deities that are meant to represent me and the others on fandom. Firekong1 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

inb4 final battle against an amalgamation of dog guy and girl loki which is identical to a flying, noclipping corpse that fires lazers from its eyes Borophagus (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Of course! And her and our other enemies as well! Like trex mostfan, frostcrush, and dinosaurs20. Firekong1 (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think she's too chill for that. Borophagus (talk) 05:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: Nope, she was a dick to me too, and when I asked her how to avoid getting into hostile situations with other users, she changed the subject to my block and said that it was justified. In addition, she also blocked indominus for no reason. Firekong1 (talk) 05:58, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Anyways, Dinosaurs20 just got permanently demoted from the Animal Database! Borophagus (talk) 06:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: That's great! Tell birds forever to block dinosaurs20 if she can. And try to get you and the crew working there as well so you can have positions of power there as well, which will safeguard the wiki and ensure its future. Firekong1 (talk) 06:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think at this point she can already deal with him if things get too bad. I feel like a block's unnecessary for now. Borophagus (talk) 06:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Borophagus: I know, but still. It'd be for the best. I hope she blocks him, and next time you should tell her just in case.

He got blocked! Firekong1 (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pediculus schaeffi

Hello, Firekong1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pediculus schaeffi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pediculus schaeffi

Hello, Firekong1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pediculus schaeffi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of freshwater fishes of Maryland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White catfish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry

Hello. Your edit appears to be incorrect here.[1] - LouisAragon (talk) 14:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your thread on the article's talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find any available sources saying that SUMKA was defunct, so I assumed they were an active underground movement and I put "is" in place of "was". Firekong1 (talk) 18:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. Firekong1 (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fuentes

You've been around long enough to know that sourceless theorizing about living persons on talkpages is not acceptable. Please don't use talkpages as fora for your own analysis. Please review past talkpage discussions concerning how Fuentes should be described. Acroterion (talk) 12:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not theorizing. Since there are sources describing him as a neo-nazi, then shouldn't we categorize him as one? I'm not labelling him one because of my political opinion, but because of genuine political analysis from various outlets, and well as Fuentes's words and actions.Firekong1 (talk) 13:05, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't cite reliable sources, it's just you editorializing about living individuals. Read WP:BLP, then read it again. Acroterion (talk) 22:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'm not emotionalizing, I have seen a legitimate source or two describing Fuentes as a neo-nazi. Firekong1 (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "if you don't cite reliable sources" don't you understand? Acroterion (talk) 00:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'm not emotionalizing, I have seen a legitimate source or two describing Fuentes as a neo-nazi. Firekong1 (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "if you don't cite reliable sources" don't you understand? Acroterion (talk) 00:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I never said I won't cite them. I'll post the sources right here:

Source 1:https://stljewishlight.org/top-story/even-neo-nazis-dont-like-each-other/

Source 2:https://money.yahoo.com/white-nationalist-virulent-antisemite-nick-155548917.html

Source 3:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hta235TfCIY

Source 4:https://newrepublic.com/post/170149/white-nationalist-nazi-nick-fuentes-back-twitter

Source 5:http://www.thedailybeast.com/neo-nazi-nick-fuentes-paid-30k-by-kanye-west-campaign

That's all the sources I could find labelling Fuentes as a neo-nazi for now. Firekong1 (talk) 00:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to read up on WP:RS too, because most of those are short of ironclad sources suitable for such a serious statement in Wikipedia's voice. Have you read the earlier discussions on that talkpage? Please do that before you make any more posts there - including the archives.. However, this is what you should have done from the very beginning on the talkpage, rather than making assumptions or unsupported assertions. I have little confidence that you understand BLP and sourcing well enough to be making accusations of such a serious nature about living persons. Acroterion (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will. I assumed some of these sources were already in the article, hence why I didn’t bring it up right away. Firekong1 (talk) 02:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, "I assumed" is an inadequate level of diligence in a BLP, much less involving a potentially defamatory statement. Please stop using that as an excuse. Acroterion (talk) 02:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not trying to use an excuse, I admit that I should’ve mentioned it earlier. Now that I cleared that up, would it be allowed to put some sources describing Fuentes as a neo nazi into his article? Firekong1 (talk) 10:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't "cleared it up," you just keep digging the hole deeper. You must find consensus on the relevant article talkpage for controversial or potentially defamatory descriptions, supporting your suggested edits with reliable sources that show a broad consensus in sourcing. That you couldn't find any more than that, and that you are using a number of questionable sources, just makes it worse. You clearly haven't read or understood WP:BLP and taken it to heart, and I am beginning to think that a topic ban for BLPs is in your future. Acroterion (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not digging any hole, I’m not in any trouble. Why would you think that?

Besides, I’m not getting banned because I haven’t broken any rules. I’m not trying to start an edit war, so I won’t edit Fuentes’s article. And I’m not sure what counts as a good source either. Firekong1 (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You keep saying things like that, and it just makes it worse, because you appear to be lacking in self-awareness where your edits and statements are concerned. I'm an administrator who has repeatedly advised you that you have violated BLP policy, and you don't seem to understand either that policy, or the reliable sourcing policy, and I question your ability to edit biographical articles within policy. So yes, you need to pay attention and educate yourself, not keep asserting that you know what you're doing. You don't, as far as I can see. Insisting that you do is unconvincing. You are playing with people's real lives when you edit a biography without due diligence. Acroterion (talk) 19:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chill, man. I won't edit blps for a while. Firekong1 (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Acroterion (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I’ll read up on the rules and edit accordingly next time. Firekong1 (talk) 02:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of natural horror films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Template:Fascism. Thank you. Rotary Engine ^talk 23:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I apologize if I made a mess, it was not my intention. Firekong1 (talk) 15:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And yet, these edits continue to add links to articles which do not describe their subjects as being related to Fascism. Rotary Engine ^talk 20:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But wouldn't Hirohito, Hideki Tojo, and Meir Kahane truly qualify as fascists on the basis of their ideologies? Hirohito and Tojo oversaw significant war crimes and were the main people who were in the Showa Statism ideology and movement. Kahane is an ethnic supremacist and some organizations were founded from his ideology of ethnic supremacy and anti-miscegenation. Firekong1 (talk) 20:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Regressive left for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regressive left is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regressive left until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Simonm223 (talk) 15:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at SUMKA, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I made the mistake since I saw others also add content without sources. I'll make sure to revert it if I see it again next time. Thanks for the reminder. Firekong1 (talk) 14:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Which pages do you think I should source? Firekong1 (talk) 18:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its a recurring theme, plus you've been warned on numerous occassions. But sure I'll play along (linking only recent cases):

Here you added two fascist-related categories to a deceased person, even though the article nor the main Pan-Iranist Party makes no mention of "fascism" throughout the article as far as I can see.
Idem here at the page of this deceased person.[2]
This edit is even worse; here you labeled a living person as "far-right", even though the article nor the person's own page makes mention of any sort of far-right politics. This one thus violates WP:BLP.

I could go on and on. This is only the very top of the iceberg as of late. Your question in response on which ones "I" think should be sourced confirms my suspicion that there are some major WP:CIR problems at hand. - LouisAragon (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for linking them to me. I was not trying to edit disruptively, I was editing in good faith. I will be much more careful in the future with my edits. Firekong1 (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 20:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Hi again! I hope you don't mind me passing through. As an additional recommendation, I thought about pointing towards Help:Archiving a talk page: you can archive old messages in your talk page if you wish so. I personally like categorizing threads by year, but it's totally optional. Kind regards, NoonIcarus (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I don’t mind, I’m always free to talk with anyone anytime. I have wanted to archive some of the messages on my talk page because they were piling up, but I didn’t know how. I’m glad you showed me. Thank you so much. :) Firekong1 (talk) 02:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World union of national socialists

I'm interested, do you happen to have a source for the addition of later countries in the WUNS - like Iran, India, Korea, Peru and Ukraine?

India and Korea in particular have little to no history of natsoc movements so it's surprising to see them added to the list. Based47 (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iran had SUMKA, India had the Indian legion, and Ukraine has the Azov battalion (although it’s debated it they’re a fully nazi group).

As for Peru, they have two nazi groups listed in their table:List of neo-Nazi organizations Firekong1 (talk) 22:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop repeated WP:NOR of Trumpism page

Assertions that certain leaders do or do not represent Trumpism require sourcing or a dispute of sourcing that claims something different than you assert. Superb Owl (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why did you replace mammals with animals at Rhinogradentia

They're a fictional order of mammals and were in the category for fictional mammals. You've twice added "fictional animals" and removed fictional mammals? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So they could appear on the category page, there are similar animals to the Rhinogradentians that are in that category, like the Caminalcules. Firekong1 (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. Generally speaking, if something is in a child category, it shouldn't be in the parent category, too. There are good arguments why it could be useful to include a page in parent/grandparent categories, too, but we have guidelines which discourage doing so because it would make those higher-level categories unwieldy and unusable. Looks like someone else went ahead and removed this category, too. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I just assumed that I should add the animals category as well so the page can appear there. Firekong1 (talk) 01:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bird of prey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert for all pages related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 19:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Alt-right, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The addition of those categories are supported, as the content fits in those categories and are justified. Firekong1 (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nick Fuentes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 00:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Right-wing populism in Malaysia

A tag has been placed on Category:Right-wing populism in Malaysia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 03:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]