User talk:Firekiino

Welcome!

Hello, Firekiino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bongbong Marcos

Thank you for your work on the biography of Bongbong Marcos.

Please refrain from deleting SOURCED information without discussing the matter on the accompanying talk page. It is appropriate, even encouraged, to delete unsourced information summarily, especially if it is potentially libelous or defamatory. But information that has credible sources should not be deleted without consensus — and certainly not just because you "don't like" it or "don't agree with" it. Thank you. David Cannon (talk) 10:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! ah i think twinkle didnt let me put an explanation for that one. So the paragraphed I removed was the one added by gobautista. While I removed most of what he wrote I really moved his general ideas to higher up in the intro paragraph to the article. I felt his paragraph also messed with the sort of flow of the intro as well given how it was already mentioned that "bongbong marcos" won the election. Saying he won again in a different paragraph instead of expanding the other one felt off and such You can find the changes I made here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bongbong_Marcos&oldid=1090774915. I think I kept some of the sources he used when i edited that section. Although I may have deleted some of the references he used in the process. I explained my sort of integration edit but then gobautista started reverting them so I guess it ended in a sort of edit war. Sorry about that. Firekiino (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, got it. It's easy to make that kind of mistake — I've done it myself on a number of occasions. Cheers. David Cannon (talk) 05:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism"

I understand and appreciate that you feel strongly about the Marcoses. However, [these edits were not "vandalism". They are a content dispute.

Vandalism is when there is no way for the person's edits to be sincere. Someone wants to portray the Marcoses more positively, or at least less negatively. There are people who genuinely feel this way.

They may be wrong. They may be trying to do a cover-up of unpleasant facts. They may be trying to present their own version. But they're not vandalizing. DS (talk) 22:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aimee Marcos. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been engaged in pushing your point-of-view in a manner which does not have concensus. This article should be written in an WP:IMPARTIAL tone. Since the article is not about Ferdinand Marcos or Imelda Marcos, such unbalanced language does not belong. Several other editors have removed your changes in this and other articles. Your activity here is WP:EDITWARING and will not be tolerated. MB 00:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cullen328 (talk) 01:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MB 03:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Human Rights Violations Victims' Memorial Commission (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article reads like a brochure for the Commission

What do independent sources say? What do Scholars say?

Wikipedia cares very little for mission statements, internal workings and accomplishments as described by the government or commission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Human Rights Violations Victims' Memorial Commission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Firekiino! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some suggested references

Hi Firekiino. You asked for suggestions regarding Human Rights Violations Victims' Memorial Commission. Looking through it again, I decided to take a quick look for some references you can use, which are listed below. Since this is your article, I hesitate to edit the draft you're making. But I think rewriting to prominently use these references, especially to highlight the wp:notability of memcom as expresssed in the lead, would do a lot to address the comment on the draft. Let me know if there are other ways I can help. Yours, MistahPeemayer (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Thanks for these references, I'll look into them as well and try integrate them into the article as well. Once again thank you so much. And a belated Merry Christmas and an advanced Happy New Year! Firekiino (talk) 06:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page section deleted

I've just removed a section of Talk:Plaza Miranda bombing created by a rather uncooperative editor evading a block. That included removing responses that you made, so if you disagree with my removal then please feel free to restore it. JBW (talk) 16:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that explains the things on the ips talk page. I thought it was just some guy who like editing but preferred not to make an account anyways thanks for the heads up Firekiino (talk) 06:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Human Rights Violations Victims' Memorial Commission

Hello, Firekiino. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Human Rights Violations Victims' Memorial Commission".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]