User talk:Firecircle

Welcome!

Hello, Firecircle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

I see you have been actively contributing already, but I hope you will find the links in this box useful.

Please note that you only need to add ~~~~ to sign at the end of your comments on talk pages, not also at the start!

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

You might like to click on "user page" above and provide some info about yourself.

Again, welcome! - Fayenatic (talk) 19:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hi Firecircle. Welcome. Thanks for creating Category:Atlantology. Are you aware of the existence of Category:Atlantis? Please see which articles we can include in the former to keep both categories accurate. So we won't be duplicating. Thanks. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 00:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FayssalF. I thought maybe a category named "Atlantology" would outline some of the methodology used by various Atlantologists in their research on the subject, e.g., underwater archeology, etc. I wouldn't care to start such a category myself, but it would be different from the general topic of Atlantis. It was just an idea. Sorry for my delay in answering, and thanks for the imput.Firecircle (talk) 06:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firecircle (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Hi Fayssalf. I see I have already created the category. One approach to fill in such a category might be to list several Atlantologists (such as Graham Hancock, Jacques Collina-Girard, Ignatius Donnelly, H. S. Bellamy, Lewis Spence, R. Cedric Leonard, Charles Berlitz, David Zink, etc.) and include (or get someone to create) the Wikipedia's articles (some of which already exist) on these individuals. What do you think? Firecircle (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firecircle (talk) 01:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC) I have just finished adding an article called Luzia Woman, a South American anthropological find. I think I am learning how Wikipedia does things, but you might check it over, just to be sure I did it right.Firecircle (talk) 01:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firecircle (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC) I took it upon myself to clean up an article named Bimini Road, adding references where needed, correcting non-factual information which had remained for more than six months, and added several paragraphs (in my own words) from the description of the original discoverer in his original published account. Take a look to see if it's Ok. Firecircle (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Yes, I'm enjoying being a contributor to Wikipedia, but I just ran into trouble on the Saul article. I used the usual "ref" format (which created the usual [1] in the text; but the reference did not appear in the reference section when clicked on. Instead it went to the Table of Contents. (The reference was John Bright's "A History of Israel"). I noticed the reference section is not using numbers.Firecircle (talk) 22:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<ref></ref> references don't display automatically. You need to put <references/> in the 'references' section of the article to make the notes display there. Algebraist 21:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll give it a try! Thanks.Firecircle (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikifying with links

I note that you are adding numerous internal links to articles. Some of your edits are not consistent with WP style guidelines. See Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Overlinking and underlinking: what's the best ratio?for info about such edits. -- Alan Liefting-talk- 20:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Firecircle (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Ok. I think I've got a better picture of what Wikifying is all about. I removed several of the links. Thanks Alan. Firecircle (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eteinne Drioton Article

Firecircle (talk) 04:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC) I recently created an article (bio) on Dr. Eteinne Drioton and somehow didn't get his name capitalized. I don't know how to correct it, and the Wikiized links to it won't work. Can you help, Alan? Firecircle (talk) 04:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notzrim Article

I saw several notices indicating that the Notzrim needed improvements in clarification and references, so I have worked it over extensively. After a week or so, I took it upon myself to remove the complaining notices. If I have overstepped the boundries, please let me know here or on the talk page of that article. Thanks. I hope I have improved the article. Firecircle (talk) 05:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:R. Cedric Leonard, you will be blocked from editing. Don't do this again, it is something that will get you banned. This is not a threat, it's what happens when people blank pages. Doug Weller (talk) 06:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doug, if I blanked anything in the last few days, I am not aware of it. Firecircle (talk) 04:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doug, I believe I know what you are refering to now. I had suggested that it might be better if I removed the whole R. Cedric Leonard article, and didn't get an answer right away. At the time, I presumed the author of an article might have that right, but I have been set straight on the rules now. I need to check "my talk" a little more often. I guess when I get a notice that I have a message, it will appear here on "my talk". Is that correct? I'm not malicious, just still learning. I am enjoying being an editor on Wikipedia--I just added a reference to the Vimanas article concerning the Pushpaka Car. Firecircle (talk) 04:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's correct, when you get a notice about a message, it will appear here. I'm sure you aren't malicious, and we all have a lot to learn. I've put some stuff on the Leonard talk page that might interest you, I hope. We'll probably disagree a lot but hopefully we can still get along personally. --Doug Weller (talk) 18:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. And thanks for answering to extensively concerning reliable sources. I can imagine what a chore it must be to attempt an online encyclopedia, such as Wikipedia. I'm glad I figured out the message format. I feel bad about putting Leonard in the Wikipedia as it turned out. I think I did him more harm than good. If you looked at the dates of his education, he probably doesn't consider "Tiahuanaco" an out of date name. Firecircle (talk) 20:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of R. Cedric Leonard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. Cedric Leonard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Cedric Leonard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 18:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]