User talk:Fire ogg

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Neeraj Chopra have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Neeraj Chopra was changed by Fire ogg (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960313 on 2022-01-27T07:37:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ashok Swain—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn talk 15:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Second Battle of Tarain, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Extorc.talk 17:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Prithviraj Chauhan, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Extorc.talk 18:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ganga-Jamuni tehzeeb, you may be blocked from editing. The word "Lord" is completely missing from the text, added on baseless grounds. >>> Extorc.talk 18:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ror. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 10:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are acting as a bully, what I edited was definitely correct and verified already, which was vandalised by somebody and I corrected. I respect your concern. Thanks Fire ogg (talk) 11:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]