User talk:Fire 55

AfD Notice

I see you put an AfD notice about Shona Holmes on my talk page. Was this a mistake? I took part in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shona Holmes, but I have not made any edits to the article. Hence I have removed the notice.  JUJUTACULAR | TALK  21:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Same here, wrong template. Could you expand your nomination to give a fuller rationale for deletion based on policy, and explain why it is correct to open another deletion discussion after the last closed as no consensus seven weeks ago. Thanks. Fences&Windows 21:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Afd Shona Holmes

May I suggest that you and Geo Swan go to WP:TEA. I know you really want this article to be deleted, and I agree with you, but being rude to other contributors isn't going to help. Play nice and push your position! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I hadn't noticed that you didn't write a new section, instead you did a cut and paste dump.[1] Not only is this not very good editing practice, is also violates our license. Fences&Windows 21:39, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

note

You went on record as describing an IP contributor commenting in the first {{afd}} for Shona Holmes eight minutes after I made a comment as "fishy" -- implying I employed sockpuppets. You offered as justification for conflating the IP user's comment with mine that it was "stupid" -- implying that I too made "stupid" comments. This was the weakest justification for leveling a sockpuppet accusation I have seen in my five years of contributing to the wikipedia.

You said you were entitled to call other contributor's comments "stupid". Well, actually, you aren't allowed to call other contributor's comments "stupid". Doing so was a lapse from compliance with our civility policies. Geo Swan (talk) 20:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mistabishi

I have nominated Mistabishi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistabishi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tim1357 (talk) 22:16, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Life starts now.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Life starts now.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mistabishi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mistabishi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistabishi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  10:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFC Undisputed 2009 Cover (both versions).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UFC Undisputed 2009 Cover (both versions).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)