Jump to content

User talk:Fiona161/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lead

[edit]

The Lead is solid, but it is a little repetitive. I know the "why" of the art movement, but the specific themes are somewhat lost. The controversies of the subject also seem lost in general terms like "social justice". What the issues entail would help to give further context to the article. Jarosas2 (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Art Work

[edit]

The "why" of the article is concise, but I think the style and themes of the art should be addressed since it is an art movement. The government response is interesting but without knowing what they were actually reacting to is troubling because there is a lack of connection for the reader. The techniques of the Mira lists would also be an interesting inclusion to the arte because it will hel to differentiate.this m Jarosas2 (talk) 21:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the spelling. Last sentence should say, "The techniques the artists use would also be an interesting includion to the article because it will help to differentiate this art movement from others. Jarosas2 (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]