User talk:Fintler/Archive/Archive-Feb2007

Transreal Numbers

Fintler, perhaps you should take the creation of new pages around the nullify concept a bit easy? You are creating stuff all over the place, perhaps we should first determine the validity of the new concept before we add it all to wikipedia and in that way creating more support for the concept that it should actually get. (As it was in the news today). --Soyweiser 15:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Soyweiser. Better to wait for universal acceptance of his theories before adding Wikipedia articles about this man's theories which may prove to be absolutely wrong. 199.212.18.131 20:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The concept is valid, it's just the application of it that is to be questioned. If we wait for universal acceptance of something before it goes on wikipedia, we're going to be waiting for quite some time. Just because someone disagrees with it doesn't make it invalid, this is a concept that has brought about much discussion and is a current event that needs reliable documentation. Controversial or not. fintler 15:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject CS

Hi! Just noticed that you have signed on as a participant in WikiProject Computer science, and wanted to welcome you to the project. Please stop by the project talk page to see what the other participants have on their minds right now, and to add your own thoughts. --Allan McInnes (talk) 03:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Prof. LJL

Unless you actually get some outside reference to his work in, and a list of publications including major journals, and wikify the article so it doesnt look like a cv, it is almost certain theatthe article will be deleted in the next few days. I warn you as a friend, but I dont have time to do the editing for you.DGG 23:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Apple iPhone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Apple iPhone.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Roguegeek (talk) 01:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Apple iPhone.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Apple iPhone.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Roguegeek (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC) Roguegeek (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]