User talk:Finbob83

Welcome!

Hello, Finbob83, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...and a human hello - the above template is a bit of a boilerplate - feel free to ask questions :) cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks. Is this something that you do when someone's done so many edits, or did you just see me somewhere? (P.S. Am I doing this reply correctly?) ;) Finbob83 (talk) 09:46, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm DVdm. Your recent edit to the page Complex number appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 10:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lead section Vulfpeck

Hi @Finbob83: about this diff1, edit summary "I agree, but needs a source". Not everything in the lead section must be cited (referenced, sourced) in the lead section itself. Lead material can be based on the body of the article and things can be sourced in the body, WP:LEAD, WP:LEADCITE. What you removed (which you also agree with) is sourced by ref. 2 link and ref. 3 link. It is based on the "background section" first paragraph, and sourced there. It is also based on the "style section" first and last sentence, and sourced there. If you feel like adding a citation to what I had in the lead section, then feel free to add a citation to this link (ref. 2), but there is no need to erase it. Though I personally think there no need to cite it in the lead.
About the second diff2, the Jim Fusilli quote is not for The Beautiful Game album, see the body of the article and the ref itself: link, that quote is for Thrill of the Arts album. So that addition is incorrect (although well intentioned and in good faith). I have reverted your edits to the earlier version which is simple, which we both agree with, and which is sourced in the body of the article. If you disagree please discuss here for consensus, thanks. Bammesk (talk) 04:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also added what you had without naming the album. Bammesk (talk) 04:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely! Sorry about my hasty edit. That's a good solution. Finbob83 (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]