User talk:FilmTurtle

Welcome!

Hello, FilmTurtle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

List of gay porn stars

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I've reverted most of your edits to the List of gay porn stars. The article is meant to be a list of performers about whom articles could and should be written here at Wikipedia. The ones you added that I've deleted from the list wouldn't qualify. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Notability (people), and Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors). Thanks.—Chidom ^talk 07:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of David McKay (adult studio owner)

A tag has been placed on David McKay (adult studio owner), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. exolon 01:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hint about Wiki links

Hola! One hint about adding a Wikipedia link: Say you mention the term "Adult Video News" three times in an article. You only need to make the first reference a Wiki link. Doing it throughout the article is repetitive and unnecessary (and makes more work for you). Be bold! Keep editing! - Tim1965 15:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Check it out: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography. You may wish to join it, or participate in their discussions. - Tim1965 16:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Did You Know...?"

If you want to get an article into "Did You Know?", you probably should nominate it yourself. First, read the rules. Make sure your article was written within the last five days, is not a stub, and has an interesting fact. Articles which cite sources tend to be picked over those which do not. Second, go to the Did You Know Discussion Page. Scroll down to the date the article was created (not the date you are submitting it). Edit that section. You will type out a "hook" (no longer than 200 characters, and appropriate terms in the hook should be Wikified). Follow the format on the existing DYK page. Make sure that you end the hook with a question mark. After the question mark, add a space, a hyphen, a space, the phrase "(selfnom)" (you are nominating your own article), and then four tildes (~~~~). Save the page. The four tildes will "sign" your hook with your name, and date it. Hopefully, the Wiki editors will find your hook interesting, and it will get on the main page! YAY! - Tim1965 16:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Porn Star
		For being an upright member of the gay porn community, for your e-rectitude in all things Wiki, for your gush of contributions, and for your penetrating glimpses into the world of adult film, all while in the thick of things. Tim1965 19:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jerry Douglas (director)

The article Jerry Douglas (director) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Command and Conquer Expert! ^{speak to me...}_{review me...} 23:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David McKay (adult studio owner)

The article David McKay (adult studio owner) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO and the GNG. Little to no reliably sourced biographical content. Promotionally tinged text. No real assertion of notability. Virtually no independent sourcing, most references are press releases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Studio 2000 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studio 2000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio 2000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 11:24, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]