User talk:Fillthemill

Hello, Fillthemill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. Here are a few important links for newcomers:

If you'd like some help with editing, you can sign up at the new users log or ask me on my discussion (talk) page. If you need other help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, post a question at the Help Desk, or ask me.

Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. It is always wise to read the most recent entries at the bottom of the talk page of an existing article before making major changes to it. Before I make a major change to an article, I often make a proposal on the talk page to see if anyone minds.

Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tim Gustard, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tim Gustard, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Gustard

I note your concerns about this article, and have already flagged some of them on the article. Simply blanking the article because you don't think it's good enough is, however, not an option. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I've tried to tidy up some of the more egregious puffery in the article, and add a well sourced reference to his only appearance at auction, but it keeps getting reverted by an editor who has never edited any other page, Fillthemill (talk) 09:43, 11 December 2011 (UTC)fillthemill[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

James Annesley, 3rd Earl of Anglesey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sir Charles Sedley and Charles I

Gonville Bromhead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to War of Independence

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited The Pitmen Painters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guardian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Gustard

You need to stop using primary sources on this BLP. You've been doing it for years, and by now you should know better. The policy is WP:BLPPRIMARY. It stops now. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message about the above. I have not used primary sources, the sources I've added to the reference lists are two reputable auction houses. I've been trying to cut out some of the unsourced items in this article if you trouble to read it. Thank you Fillthemill (talk) 14:44, 18 February 2013 (UTC)fillthemill

Those are primary sources. Take a look at WP:PSTS. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:52, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The auction records are publicly available and were arrived at via a secondary source, www.artprice.com. As the latter is only available on subscription, there is little point in using it as a reference link as most users would not be able to access it, therefore the references are covered by WP:PSTS "primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Wikipedia". The rest of the article is largely unsourced and unreferenced and appears mainly based on information that can only come from personal experience, which is in danger of making wikipedia a primary source of that material. Thank you. Fillthemill (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)fillthemill[reply]

Again, the relevant policy here is WP:BLPPRIMARY, and the source you are using is obviously a primary source. The subject has complained at WP:BLPN; another editor has expressed concern about your editing, and I agree with that concern. My advice is to tread carefully. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:10, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Henry Roberts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marlborough School, Exeter College and National Farmers' Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Holman Hunt

The Shadow of Death has been owned by Manchester since the late 19th century, so I don't see how it can have set an auction record in the 1990s, unless you are referring to another version of the image. Where is this - currently uncited - information from? Paul B (talk) 09:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's taken from artprice.com, a subscription-only website that details all auction records since about 1990. I'll check to make sure it's not another version of the picture - although MCAG website only says the picture is 2held" there, rather than owned. Fillthemill (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)fillthemill[reply]

I have the complete Holman Hunt catalogue raisonné at home, so I will check that tonight. Paul B (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was in MCAG today and the invigilator told me that the (or their) Shadow of Death is on loan at the moment to an exhibition in the US but will be back soon. So it looks as if the one that was sold in 1994 must be a different version of the MCAG one. Fillthemill (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked the Judith Bronkhurst catalogue raisonné (somewhat later than promised), and, yes, it was a reduced-sized copy that was sold in 1994. The large version was acquired by Manchester in 1883. I would imagine it's now worth a bit more than 1.8 mill (Bronkhurst's figure is £1,874.500). Still, I'm surprised that the record price for a Hunt is so low, even though it was for a copy. I guess it's because most of his major works are in public collections. Paul B (talk) 10:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. The £1.7m figure is the hammer price, the higher price will be the hammer + buyer's commission total. Fillthemill (talk) 13:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC)fillthemill[reply]

Yes, I realise that. I've bought art myself. Paul B (talk) 13:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Howard, 9th Earl of Carlisle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Way of St. James (route descriptions), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Toledo and Ávila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of Santiago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cáceres (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maling pottery

From the edit history of the article on the Maling pottery, it looks like you made some edits in December 2011 concerning the family relationships of the Maling family. I have followed the online sources at the bottom of the article and don't seem to find references to the information you added. Could you please consult your sources and either add your sources to the article, correct the article, or undo your changes.

I don't believe that the generational suffices "I" and "II" are accurate, and I think you have incorrect information regarding the father of Robert Maling.

One of the references at the bottom of the article is:

Bell, R.C. "Maling and Other Tyneside Pottery", Shire Publications. (1986) ISBN 0-85263-792-6

According to this source:

"He [William Maling (1698-1765)] founded the North Hylton Pot Works in 1762, using clay from a rich bed nearby, and appointed his two sons, Christopher Thompson Maling (1741-1810) and John Maling (1746-1823), to run the business."
"In 1815 John's son Robert (1781-1863) transferred the business to Tyneside."
"In 1853 Christopher Thompson Maling (1824-1901) took over the running of the Ouseburn Bridge pottery from his father, Robert, and the firm prospered under the new leader's ability."

Furthermore, from my genealogical sources, Robert's son Christopher Thompson Maling would not have been the second with this name. Robert also had a brother named Christopher Thompson Maling (1787-1809). It's possible there were other descendants of William Maling and Catherine Thompson born between 1741 and 1824 and who were also named Christopher Thompson Maling, so it's possible that Robert's son Christopher Thompson Maling was not even the third with that name. Of course, there have been many other Maling's with the same name born in the generations since. I understand that they trace the name back to Christopher Thompson of Hendon Lodge (1675-?), maternal grandfather of the first Christopher Thompson Maling and father-in-law of the William Maling who started the Maling pottery business.

Since the source material doesn't make reference to the various people named Christopher Thompson Maling by the use of a generational suffix, I don't think it best to introduce them on the Wikipedia article. I suspect the best method is to follow the style used in the source material, which in this case is by the use of years of birth and death in parentheses.

Kind regards, Steve --216.174.134.2 (talk) 22:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederick Campbell (general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Campbell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Barclay (Quaker), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Odd signature

I have just noticed that your auto-magically created signature is malformed. It places a fillthemill after the time stamp -- there are examples on this page. I have only seen that one before and in that case the signature ending was present even when the person was logged out as IP signatures from that user continued to have the ending, so what is causing it may not be obvious. -- PBS (talk) 02:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Owain Glyndŵr may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Wales.html?id=NLc-PAAACAAJ&hl=en Google Books edition of Thomas Pennant's ''A Tour in Wales'' (1810 edition]</ref> Previously, [[George Owen of Henllys|George Owen]], in his ''A Dialogue of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Hello, Fillthemill. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been activated so you should have full access now. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 11:35, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Hindmarsh

Thank you for your edit to the article on John Hindmarsh. I have deleted the Victory from the list of ships he served on. He did not serve on that ship; he merely went on board to receive his promotion from Admiral Nelson.

Please could you have a look at the talk page concerning events at the Battle of the Nile. Your comments would be appreciated.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Feaver, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Observer and George Cruickshank. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Avray Wilson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camino de Santiago (route descriptions), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Almeida. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fillthemill. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen III of Hungary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Komnenos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fillthemill. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fillthemill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]