User talk:Filipjako

March 2021

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Jovan Rašković) for a period of 72 hours for Jovan Rašković. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read wp:vandal and wp:npa, if you call good faith edits vandalism agasin I will take you to wp:ani, stop.Slatersteven (talk) 09:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slatersteven And you stop with the threats and the one-sided baiting. If you're not interested at all in understanding the conflicting contribution, which I explained in my recent comment on the edit warring page, then let someone judge who has actual interest and knowledge. Do you even understand what's controversial about the edit? Filipjako (talk) 10:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes as I said at the edit war page "Well looking at the debate it is one croation author using dodgy source material to repeat a claim. When he was reverted he should have made a case at talk, not edit warred.", so yes I get what the objection is. That still does not make it valdiams it makes it a wp:npov and (as I also said at the edit war board) an issue of wp:undue. NOw you have been wanred, stop woith the PA's.Slatersteven (talk) 10:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

YOu have been blocked, try to understand why.Slatersteven (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]