User talk:Filipinofox

Filipinofox, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Filipinofox! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello Filipinofox. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Filipinofox. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Filipinofox|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 07:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GSS, I am not being paid by anyone to edit articles or create them . I’m not sure why I am being accused of that . I like to edit content around asian people and companies . Filipinofox (talk) 08:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Becasue there is evidence off-wiki. GSS ^💬 08:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk)

I’m really confused what evidence and where ? I’m just a random anime geek and asian American 20 something. Is it wrong to edit only Asian topics and things I know about from the news ? Filipinofox (talk) 08:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did I reply correctly sorry @GSS Filipinofox (talk) 08:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne Vieux (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If she meets WP:ARTIST, make it clear how she does so. Also, try writing straightforwardly: as an example, instead of Vieux's work is situated in abstract painting, but expands this field through public installations, artist books, video, and sculpture, try Vieux makes abstract paintings, and also public installations, books, video, and sculpture (each with a reliable, independent, published reference, of course).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anne Vieux and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anne Vieux, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 13:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoary

The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

Those are the guidelines. Her work has WORLDCAT identifiers meaning it's been in several notable galleries . Explain to me how the MET gallery and MOFA are not notable as they are some of the worlds finest  ART collections . Her work has been permanent and again has authority control. Filipinofox (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bokksu

Hello, Filipinofox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bokksu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bokksu

Hello, Filipinofox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bokksu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]