User talk:Fila3466757

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fila3466757 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Fila3466757, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Rod ^talk 21:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As for something,I AM telling YOU to do somethings. 1.Add numbers to disused stations if they have 0 platforms. What if someone gave someone a test to see how many disused stations in the United Kingdom? And also replace those queston marks and number 0s! I want to see that by tommorow! 2. Add pictures to railway stations that have over 2 platforms and have no picture. Thank you for adding pictures to some stations. And some stations have been i that state for years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I want to see that by tommorow as well!!!!!!!

There is something inapropereat!!!!!!!!!!!! Why Fuck are you removing pictures from railway stations!!!!!!!!!!!???????????????!!!!!!!!! It is EXTREMLEY silly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh Fuck. Thats what you did to 4 railway stations,like Westbury!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What the Hell you do,DONT remove pictures off of railway stations!!!!!!!!!!!! Fuck you railway station image remover!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--John (talk) 17:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Deletions

Next time, check out why an image has been removed and who has removed it. If you feel it should be there, be BOLD and re-instate yourself.

In the case of Westbury the inage was deleted because of copyright issues.

If you wish to make a point use acceptable language and post a message on the appropriate talk page (User concerned or relevant article). Your message here is not likely to be seen by the editor how removed the image. --Stewart^(talk) 17:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

Have you previously edited here as User:Farlack913 and User:ScotRail421? Please see WP:SOCK for our policy on multiple accounts. Thank you, --John (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

''''''''''''''''''''YES OF COURCE'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Why are you removing my information??????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That IS stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If YOU do THAT AGAIN,I SHALL block YOU from editing Wikipedia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And thats a promise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your edits

If you would take the time to read your edits and validate the information prior to saving the page, you would not see so many of your edits reverted.

Adding messages such as those in the section above will be considered as a threat and will result in the Admins taking a view on your continued ability to edit articles. --Stewart^(talk) 17:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dilton Marsh railway station

Please be aware that you made an incorrect edit to this article. This station has two platforms, not one. If you are unsure, please don't edit. Thank you. Signalhead (talk) 18:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Itchen Abbas railway station

If you did this,why did you revert this railway station????????? Alresford and Winchester are open and why does it say they are closed. Keep it open,OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????!!!!!!!!!!!

If you had taken the time to look at the revision history for this page you would have identified who had editted the page. Your reversion is incorrect as the line is closed. I have revised the page as you should have done to reflect the current information. --Stewart^(talk) 21:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

I Do not want to be a sock puppet!!!!!!!!!! I dont even know what that means!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fila3466757 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous response to a query from Admin User:John indicates that you are using multiple accounts. Please read notes for the suspect for further information. --Stewart^(talk) 21:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elgin railway station

Right. Thats IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If YOU remove a image again, I SHALL BLOCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Youve done that to 5 railway stations, YOU IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Its Inaproepreat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BLOODYJHRHLLKDFUCJPLDSJHHITWAQSNMK@%r^5\6A7AY\yedytsysahxuahzuyaszsdtde d65 And Inverurie station that is Pathetic YOU IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 6 NOW!!!!!!!!!!!

Please do not post inappropriate language on your talk page. Admins may take an interest in this. Have you read the revision history of the affected pages. The images were deleted due to copyright issues. IF you have an issue with what has been done, post on the affected talk pages. --Stewart^(talk) 06:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

''''''''''Why are you removing pictures of railway stations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!''''''''''''''''''''''''

'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' dchfgfhdgcydhgy hydjxcgs78dywstw5ar'cvfhdfvhvydcdcfyhf@@@@@@@@@fg hfvyvfr7dg7fykjgiktuiuy67ughuhgyutyhgur6f4rydedgedf REMOVING PICTURES OFF STATIONS THAT HAD A PICTURE ADDED AND YOU ARE BEING SILLY ITS FROM OUR COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your outbursts demonstrate that you do not appear to understand how Wikipedia works. If you would take the time to review the pages that have had the pictures removed, you would see that the images were removed from Wikipedia for copyright violations. The image tags on the affected articles are intially commented out, and then removed and the images no longer exist on Wikipedia. A review of the page histories and the image logs will give you the full view of what has happened.

If you have issues with individual pages, please put a comment on the affect talk page as it is unlikely that the relevant editor will be looking here.

You should be aware that these outbursts are noticed. Threatening to block people will - and has - resulted in Admins being notified. They will take a view and respond accordingly. If you have an issue which you feel is not be adequately address, contact an admin or put the {{helpme}} tag on your talk page with your query below. --Stewart^(talk) 14:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gare de Valence TGV

If you had taken some time and look at the documentation associated with {{Infobox France station}}, you would have found the correct syntax to add the number of platforms. If you intend the edit the info box of any further French station please read the Template:Infobox France station. --Stewart^(talk) 22:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reading railway station

Please be aware that you made an incorrect edit to this article. This station has 12 platforms, not 11. If you are unsure, please don't edit. Thank you. Signalhead (talk) 22:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well,there was 11 platforms on the plan!

No, there are 12 platforms on the plan. Not only that, but the number of each platform is listed in the article. Go on, count them. And will you please start signing your comments on talk pages like you are supposed to. Signalhead (talk) 08:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Fila3466757 (talk) 17:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of railway station pictures

Scotland IS NOT a country for pictures of railway stations that have had a picture added been removed!!!!!!!!!!! GO and do this in an other countrys railway stations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (preceding unsigned comment by User:Fila3466757)

Suspension bridge

YOU are the case!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! now stop reverting my edits or ELSE youll be banned! Just STOP IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fila3466757 (talk • contribs) 08:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC) The Forth Road Bridge IS famous!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![reply]

Once again you have blamed someone who has did not undertake the edit that you are complaining about. Did you look at the revision history? That will identify who deleted the information. Why did you not post on the talk page with your concerns? Your outbursts are not helpful and I will be drawing them to attention of an admin. --Stewart^(talk) 18:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Stewart^(talk) 21:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Behaviour

Fila3466757, your responses to other editors are clearly uncivil and your behaviour is reaching the stage of unacceptable personal attacks and harassment. Please act in a civil and constructive way and cease disruptive editing, or you will be blocked. .. dave souza, talk 23:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjects France and Germany

Are these availible,can I sign up for them? Fila3466757 (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppetry confirmed

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Additionally your edits have included falsification of information, and incivility. When you return, please only add facts to Wikipedia which can be verified by reliable sources, and avoid making hostile comments to other contributors. When typing with all CAPS and lots of exclamation points, that is the equivalent of yelling, which is wrong. Jehochman ^Talk 14:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On my watchlist GOOD' things are BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why the H**l is this?????????? Fila3466757 (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the talk page better??????????????????????????????? Fila3466757 (talk) 18:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fila3466757 (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Signalhead (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fila7345 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ЭLСОВВОLД _talk 16:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fila3466757 (3rd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. dave souza, talk 13:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fila3466757 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting ublocking for User:Okay15, a suspected sock of this account, because User:Hersfold says I have to request unblocking on the main account, which is this account. I have reformed and will no longer vandalize any railway station-related articles.

Decline reason:

No reason for you to have two accounts. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fila3466757 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dylan (chat, work, ping, sign) 01:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

If I could, I could get unblocked. But sadly, I've forgotten the password. Is it all right if I do a fresh start, and create another account? I will follow policy. 78.148.102.206 (talk) 19:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you're banned for long-term socking, no, I'm pretty doubtful that it would be OK. Although, when you evaded your block with User:Filper01, User:Okay15, User:Ciaran1534, User:45ODY, User:Vilbafo534, User:Ciaran UK, User:Stanley Bulgaria, User:Bialystok453, and now User:Valerian456, were you trying to "do a fresh start?" Because indef-blocked/banned users are not allowed to created new accounts to "do a fresh start." The fact that you have created over a dozen socks to evade your block only makes it worse. Also, while I believe your claim that you are no longer a vandal, you don't have to be one to cause problems for Wikipedia editors. Although, in fairness, I will compliment you for this. --Dylan 620 _{Efforts · Toolbox} 20:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think this editor could be invited to request unblock after three months in which he does not create any new socks and does not edit Wikipedia at all, even as an IP. That would be proper evidence that he has had a change of heart. EdJohnston (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fila3466757 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dylan 620 _{Efforts · Toolbox} 14:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fila3466757 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. SUL (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]