User talk:Fighting for Justice

Archives

Britney Spears

Hi, um why did you revert my edits if you check i had correct citings and correct information??? Take a look at evrything I edited TotalBlackout —Preceding undated comment added 04:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Pro-pedophile activism

Hi, could you pop over to the MedCom wiki and take a look at a way to move forward? I've copied over the introduction and would like everyone be bold an make changes to it, hopefully we should be able to thrash out a consensus. Take a look at this. Ryan Postlethwaite 20:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I noticed your participation in discussions about this user, or similar articles to those which he was seemingly banned for editing.

See at the bottom of the talkpage:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TlatoSMD Karla Lindstrom 10:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PPA

Hey, could you go to this link? I've created a proposal for the mediation to put new editors and SPA's editing the PPA page, and other related pages under the supervision of some neutral admins. Ryan Postlethwaite 02:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Pedophile topic mentorship

As part of the pro-pedophile activism mediation, I've created a mentorship page with appointed mentors for editors to report problems to. The mentors will be expected to keep editorial decorum on the pages and also help enforce policy derived editing on the pages. I would appreciate your input on the talk page. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite 00:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Benward

Thank you for your edit. Sorry it took so long. Meldshal42_{Comments and Suggestions}^{My Contributions} 01:02, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that...!

I'd deleted a few other similar stubs about an hour ago by a different user. I thought this was another of the same. I'll restore it in a moment. I didn't know it was done by an established user. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. Things like this sometimes get swept up during new pages patrol. Good luck on the article! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Karla-tucker-lg.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karla-tucker-lg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 21:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions to UBC article

Hi, I noticed that you rolled back many edits to the University of British Columbia article. Most of the edits that you rolled back were additional citations and corrections of verifiable information (e.g. the library volume count) that improve the article. Did you have another reason to undo all those edits? I noticed that you undid the deletion of a paragraph on Phrateres, but it seems like the other rollbacks were unnecessary. Do you mind if I undo your edits to the other sections? (Edit: Got no reply so went ahead with it, please discuss if there's a problem) --Shimei (talk) 04:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abigail Breslin

Why did you revert my edits on her page? On featured articles about actors, there are always information about the critical and commercial reception of their films and comments on their performances in particular. Aquila89 (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did, on March 10. You wrote that Rotten Tomatoes is not a reliable source. But than you reverted your own edits, so it doesn't matter anymore. Aquila89 (talk) 09:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I complained about it then, on this very page. You responded eleven days later. Aquila89 (talk) 15:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I wrote the first message at March 10, it shows the date. But this all doesn't matter anymore, so let's just leave it there. Aquila89 (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Sexual Healing (South Park)

Your recent reverts, removed Wikiprojects and WP:GAC information. Please be more careful in the future when removing WP:FORUM related posts. CTJF83 chat 19:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just a friendly notice post :) CTJF83 chat 19:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, your forum removal was correct, but you (probably accidentally) removed wikiprojects and the WP:GAC info. Not a huge deal :) CTJF83 chat 19:31, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Butters' Very Own Episode

I am checking with you to see why you took away my addition about Susan Smith. In the Susan Smith article it mentions the South Park episode. The South Park episode description should be clear as to which part is referencing Susan Smith. If you would like I can cite a news article with a break down of the Susan Smith case. Merin Sun (talk) 06:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and put it back in. See if I care. Fighting for Justice (talk) 05:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting the spoiler

Hey, I just want to point out that spoilers aren't reverted on Wikipedia because some people might be spoiled. However, edits without reliable sources should definitely be removed. Continue to revert those sourceless edits; it is very much appreciated. However, if a reliable source is found for the spoiler though, it can't be removed. Thanks, Feedback ^☎ 22:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Bieber

Why do you keep reverting my edits? How are they vandalism? I am adding that the song debuted not only at #1 in U.S. but also in Ireland and Canada and I cite verifiable sources. What's wrong!? Candyo32 (talk) 21:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eli Mattson album

Why did you remove Eli Mattson's latest album details? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nima1024 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just wanted to make you aware of the discussion here, in the event that it is of interest to you. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fighting. I noticed your revert on Munich massacre. While I welcome participation from more editors, you may want to familiarize yourself with the content dispute beforehand, as it has a long history. For starters, please read the talk page, WP:WTA, Talk:Al-Qaeda#The_term "terrorist" as factual. dmyersturnbull ⇒ talk 06:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Step Back to Reality.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Step Back to Reality.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]