User talk:Fidofelix

Welcome

Hello, Fidofelix, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. Here are a few important links for newcomers:

If you'd like some help with editing, you can sign up at the new users log or ask me on my talk page. If you need other help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, post a question at the Help Desk, or ask me.

It is always wise to read the most recent entries at the bottom of the talk page of an existing article before making major changes to it, to it to see if your proposed change has been discussed before. Before I make a major change to an article, I often make a proposal on the talk page to see if anyone minds.

Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fidelis Morgan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bento00 (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your note on my Talk page, if you provide a verifiable source for the information you attempt to add, it is not likely it would be contested. Bento00 (talk) 00:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- I have done what you suggested on my talk page, and sent an email from the Fidelis Morgan website. If you follow the instructions in the email, that should suffice. As I wrote, I'm sorry for being a stickler, many times unsourced information is added to pages, and we are trying to maintain the integrity of our information. It's for everyone's protection.

Thanks for your patience. Bento00 (talk) 18:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- - I must admit this was an unusual way to verify information, but it works for me. I've reverted the Fidelis Morgan page to reflect your changes. Thanks again. Bento00 (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Fidelis Morgan, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 23:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please see WP:BLP. Your edits must have reliable sources. Woogee (talk) 02:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fidelis Morgan

I have restored the blpsources and coi tags. Please do not remove the blpsources tag until you provide reliable sources, which you have still not done, and it would never be appropriate for you to remove the coi tag, since it's your conflict of interest that it addresses. Woogee (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start again?

Hello, Ms. Morgan. I can help you expand your Wikipedia article and the other articles that you are interested in here on Wikipedia. I see that you have run into difficulty in dealing with other contributors in editing articles, such as your own, with which you have a personal connection. But if you want to work together with me, I can help you get lots of changes made in a way that will make all of the contributors comfortable. I have left you a "welcome message" at the top of this page that contains links to some of our most important editing guidelines and editing tips. The main problem with your article is that it needs sources. Details of our rule about sources are found at this link: WP:Verifiability. Briefly, this rule requires that sources be given for all of the facts stated in the encyclopedia (of course many articles besides your own need more sources, but let's deal with one article at a time). For most information, the source needs to be independent published sources, like newspaper articles, journals and books. For each source, complete bibliographical information is needed. For example, to cite a newspaper review of a show that you acted in, we need to state the name of the author, the title of the article, the publication, date and page number. So, we need to dig up those details about reviews of your most important acting roles, and then we can discuss the roles in the article. Four your writings, published criticism, reviews or feature articles or a published profile of you and your career are the kind of sources we can use. Lots of newspaper articles, even older ones, can be found online these days (especially using library databases), so I can help you do the research. Once we have polished up your article, we can turn to the ones for your friends or other subjects that interest you on Wikipedia. Let me know if you want to work with me. Let's keep all the discussion together here on this page - you can reply right here, and I will get a notification from my watchlist when you do so. Best regards! -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]