User talk:Fferllys

Welcome

Hello, Fferllys, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Kingdom of Gwynedd‎, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Vardon Verdon coat of arms.png

Thanks for uploading File:Vardon Verdon coat of arms.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Afon Gwy

Hello Fferllys. I've reverted you on a couple of pages now, so I figured I'd tell you, the spelling Gwy is correct without the circumflex on the w. Cf. here or here. The Welsh Wikipedia articles for the river and Rhwng Gwy a Hafren are at Afon Gwy and Rhwng Gwy a Hafren, respectively. You don't need to change articles to include the circumflex. Thanks, and let me know if I can be of any other assistance.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clan MacBean

Hellow Fferllys. Lets just get a few things straight about the Clan MacBean article. Wikipedia is not about quoting large exact excerpts from the given sources. In this case: "An Etymological Dictionary of the Gaelic Language". By all means quote this book as a source but put it into your own words - this is what Wikipedia is all about - reflecting what the sources say in your own words. Another thing I would like to mention is that the source I have used (Collins Scottish Clan Encyclopedia) uses both the spelling MacBean and MacBain depending on which individual it is referring to and it is important to use the same spelling of someone's name that is used in the source. For example the book I have used, uses the spelling MacBean for the 6 foot 4 inch hero at the Battle of Culloden and then uses the spelling MacBain for the man who helped Cameron of Lochiel off the field at the same battle. This brings me to another problem. As I have already mentioned the chief spells his name as MacBain and under Scottish law a man named MacBain cannot be chief of a clan named MacBean - the chief's surname has to be that of the clan name. But don't get me wrong, I know that people who have the different spelling variations can still be part of the clan. I am not in a great rush to change the article name but thought I should mention this. I am more concerned about the article content. Another thing, you seem to be concerned about the historical accuracy of the information which is great because I am too - however again Wikipedia is about reflecting what the sources say - even if it is not necessarily accurate. If there is a piece of sourced information that you don't agree with then you must quote a source that says otherwise in order to remove what you think is incorrect information. And lastly may I remind you that any unsourced information can be removed from Wikipedia without warning. Thanks. QuintusPetillius (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much QuintusPetillius I do appreciate all of this. When I started editing what I found I did so with a wish to make sure it was much more accurate and was keen to share data that I thought would be helpful and accurate, and very rarely available to others. I entirely see I did not follow the Wikipedia guidelines and have now studied these and am doing (when time permits!) the best I can to improve in Wikipedia fashion, what I edited. I was too keen and passionate to correct what I found and improve upon it, but thereby went too far with the data! I think a book is a better course of action :) ...actually seriously, I may do that.--Fferllys (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC) P.S. I hope I have linked this correctly so you see my reply...[reply]

Tags removed from Clan MacBean article

Hi, I have removed the Tags from the Clan MacBean article as you have clearly made amendments. The end result is a better wikipedia article. Keep citing the sources, put into your own words, and try to avoid using big sections of exact text from the sources. I am trying to get all the Scottish clan articles up to a good standard. Cheers. QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chattan Confederation - incorrect use of external links

You appear to have misunderstood what editing Wikipedia is about again with you edits to the Chattan Confederation article. Lets just be perfectly clear. Wikipedia:External links#Important points to remember states "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article. Instead, include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article, and in the appropriate location within an infobox, if applicable". It is obvious that if there is a Wikipedia article about a subject then that takes priority over an external link in the body of a Wikipedia article.QuintusPetillius (talk) 11:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is most helpful, thank you for your guidance once more, and your patience with my continuing learning curve. (Fferllys (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Improvements to Clan MacBean article

Hi, I see you have added some references to the Clan MacBean article, this is great your are improving as a Wikipedian. I have reformatted some of the references you have added. Basically if you see my edit you will see that the reference only has to be written out once and then it can be repeated and used again using a certain formula. Just a couple of things: if you could add page numbers to the books that have been used as references then this improves the quality of the article. Also adding the year of the publication to the reference is good. Cheers. QuintusPetillius (talk) 13:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your kind and encouraging words. I tried but couldn't figure out how you did multiple references to the same source, so am most grateful that you sorted that out more neatly for me. I'll check through them all when I have time and add publication dates and page numbers. Fferllys (talk) 11:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chattan Confederation page

Hi, I do not mind the Chattan Confederation page being renamed Clan Chattan as that seems to be the proper name going by the official association web site. However, I do think we should lose the idea on Wikipedia that the Clan Chattan was in fact a confederation of clans that did not follow the normal pattern of other Scottish clans.QuintusPetillius (talk) 18:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, I'll make the change to the page name, and also edit the reference to the confederation; I'll check authoritative sources and make sure I get this right before doing so. --Fferllys (talk) 19:45, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clan MacBean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beinn a' Chaorainn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for alerting me to this - I had indeed inadvertently linked to a disambiguation page and have now fixed it :) --Fferllys (talk) 13:20, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fferllys. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fferllys. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fferllys. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]