User talk:Ferris3001

Hello, Ferris3001. You have new messages at Ponyo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ferris3001, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Ferris3001!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ferris3001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no affiliation with any other editor or user and I was blocked incorrectly due to incorrect association. please unblock and be more understanding of allowing additions to human knowledge

Decline reason:

The first step of WP:GAB is honesty. Actions and statements say the opposite of what is claimed in thi sunblock request the panda ₯’ 00:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you sure that you "have no affiliation with any other editor or user"? What connection do you have to the editor who used the username NLZ06? And how do you reconcile your statement that you "have no affiliation with any other editor or user" with your statement on another talk page that another editor who is now blocked "helped with the editing of the article" and "helped upload it"? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:34, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Based on this conversation on my talk page, the best case scenario here is that this is a paid editing attempt gone awry. That's a pretty crappy "best case".--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]