User talk:Fernasteroidfox123

September 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Hemilophus, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. This edit did not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.

Additionally, you've made a number of edits adding italics or bold in places where they don't belong. If there is in fact a valid reason, please explain in the edit summary. For reference, see the Manual of Style: MOS:ITALICS, MOS:BOLD. Thanks.

— W.andrea (talk) 01:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I noticed that you seem to be drafting an article "Adele Tomlin" on your user page, however, this may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. Your main user page is intended for basic information about yourself; it is not an encyclopedia article and should not be styled to look like one. The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your sandbox space or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles.

For example, you could create User:Fernasteroidfox123/sandbox/Adele Tomlin

Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia!

— W.andrea (talk) 16:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adele Tomlin (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. The subject doesn't seem to meet the notability criteria for a biography on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adele Tomlin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fernasteroidfox123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]