User talk:Fernando8039

December 2017

Hello, I'm Dr Greg. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Argos (retailer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dr Greg talk 19:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boyzone Album 2018 (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too soon. When the album actually has a name, has been released and has reviews is the time for an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boyzone Album 2018 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boyzone Album 2018, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fernando8039, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Islam— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm GUtt01, and I wanted to let you know that your recent edits on Ant & Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway are not very helpful, and also constitute Original Research, which goes against Wikipedia's policies. While it's understandable that you wanted to update the article over recent events in the news, your decision to modify the presenters for the programme because of this cannot be substantiated at this time - at present, there is no official confirmation by the show's broadcaster to indicate if there is to be a change in the presenters because of this news article. Until it can be confirmed, and a citation provided to back up the change, please leave the information that is there unchanged for the time being. GUtt01 (talk) 13:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Antonio Conte. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fernando8039, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

--Animalparty! (talk) 17:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]