User talk:Fernando18/sandbox

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Aaleksanian
Date of review	4/26/2013
Name of editorReplace with username for version on talk page	Wikipedia User:Fernando 18
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	04/26/13
Date review submitted to instructor	04/26/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image appropriate.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	N/A
Wikiformatting	External links was good, bullet points,nice formatting
Grammar & composition	None
Other comments	Nice Job

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: M.Caban
Date of review	4/27/2013
Name of editorReplace with username for version on talk page	Wikipedia User:Fernando 18
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	04/27/13
Date review submitted to instructor	04/27/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image is appropriate.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate to textbook
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	N/A
Wikiformatting	External links and bullet points are great.
Grammar & composition	Good
Other comments	Good job

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:MsNika349
Date of review	4/27/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User:Fernando 18
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	04/27/13
Date review submitted to instructor	04/27/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image was appropriate.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Information was Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate
Wikiformatting	Very good wiki formatting. Showed understanding of how to properly format.
Grammar & composition	Good altogether
Other comments	Good edit overall.

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:CRamel16
Date of review	5/2/2013
Name of editorReplace with username for version on talk page	Wikipedia User:Fernando 18
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/2/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/2/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image appropriate.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	N/A
Wikiformatting	External links were used, bullet points,good formatting
Grammar & composition	None
Other comments	Good Work

Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin

Date of review: 5/15/2013

Name of editor Wikipedia User: Wikipedia User: Fernando 18

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): short but simple length

Image (needed/appropriate): image was a good choice

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): information from the text was accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): N/A

Wikiformatting: the links were also a good idea, nice formatting

Grammar & composition: grammar and composition was good.

Other comments: great job overall!