Peer Review

Name of student reviewer **	Wikipedia User: Aaleksanian
Date of review	5/2/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Fernando18
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fernando18/Personal_sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/5/2013
Date review submitted to instructor	5/5/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Appropriate length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	N/A
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Article information provided is accurate and infromative
Wikiformatting	Nice Job!
Grammar & composition	Good
Other comments	Time to post !

Name of student reviewer **	Wikipedia User: M.Caban
Date of review	5/2/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Fernando18
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fernando18/Personal_sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/2/2013
Date review submitted to instructor	5/2/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	The information provided was accurate from the article
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	The information was very accurate and helpful.
Wikiformatting	Good on bullets
Grammar & composition	None found
Other comments	Excellent. Need proper citations.

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo

Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor: Fernando Ramos Fernando18

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/1/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 5/1/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): 3 sentences

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: bullets, list form

Grammar & composition: Perfect grammar and composition

Other comments: Great work! Very informative!

Name of student reviewer *

Wikipedia User:CRamel16

Date of review

5/1/2013

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**

Wikipedia User: Fernando18

URL of editor’s Userpage

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer *	Wikipedia User:CRamel16
Date of review	5/1/2013
Name of editorReplace with username for version on talk page	Wikipedia User: CRamel16
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/Personal_sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/1/2013
Date review submitted to instructor	5/1/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image not needed.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	The information provided was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	The article information was relevant to I/O Psych topic and added information was accurate.
Wikiformatting	Good on bullets,not numbered, and no link.
Grammar & composition	None found
Other comments	good job