User talk:Fergus mac Róich

Thanks for the kind words at Irish people! Cheers! Fergananim 21:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Irish people image

Hi we were having a discussion on Talk:Irish_people about this collage and the consensus was to have more people and no Irish Americans in the image. If you have specific objections please discuss on the talk page. Thanks Arniep 15:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, unfortunately no one seems to have yet found a photo of James Joyce that is in the public domain in the U.S. which is required for a collage to avoid copyright issues. Arniep 16:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Dylan Lake (t·c·ε) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Ian Paisley

Fergus, it was somewhat misleading to put in your edit commentary, "fixed typo", when what you did was change the phrase "fiercely anti-Catholicism" to "fiercely anti-Catholic". That's not good. Paisley, bad an' all as he is, is not "Anti-Catholic" - that's just factually incorrect - Alison^☺ 16:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ach! apologies! i sincerely didnt notice the semantic confussion there. The phrase "ian paisly is anti catholicism" is grammaticaly incorrect. However, i agree upon second examination that "Ian Paisly is anti-catholic" paints an entirely new, and certainly misleading image. Perhaps a more suitable adjustment would be to change the line to something like "Ian paisley is a fierce critic of the Catholic Church" or "Ian Paisly is a fierce advocate of anti-catholicism" ? Again, sorry for the misunderstanding and thanks for catching it. Fergus mac Róich 16:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basque people

I reverted your change to the Basque people article. A change like that would need a source, and our Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA) article doesn't support your changes. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 08:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oh, my apologies, i had thought that i had sourced the change already. I was basing it on two BBC articles i had seen which discussed the same haplogroup research. The first dealt with the Basque link and, in reference to the conection to the British Isles, specified Ireland, wales, and the highlands of scotland. The second article discussed the sharpness of contrast between this group (as represented by Wales primarily in the article) and the results garnered in England. here are the links to the articles in case you're interested:

1)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/1256894.stm

2)http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/2076470.stm

anyway, thanks again for catching the slip and hope the links help. Cheers Fergus mac Róich 18:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:James Joyce.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:James Joyce.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skalk

The article Skalk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits, nothing in google books, suspected to be a local neologism

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nick Penguin_(contribs) 06:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]