User talk:Fengergold

Speedy deletion of "Guarana power"

A page you created, Guarana power, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Superflex

Fengergold, the Superflex article was deleted because it had been tagged for multiple copyright violations (that is, sections of it had been copy-pasted from a variety of websites) and it had remained unimproved after 7 days. At your request, I re-examined the article and decided the article could be selectively salvaged. I think the introduction to the article was written previous to this article - which makes it a reverse copyright violation. At the moment, it can be remain unless than wayback machine proves it was copied from another source. The Free Beer section was deleted because the source displays a Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.5 license and Wikipedia requires the 3.0 version. Two more sections were deleted because you had directly copy-pasted them from other sources [1] [2]. We can only use copied text if a source is in the public domain, displays a Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 license or mailed permission to Wikipedia's OTRS office. And even then, the text in the article needs to have proper attributions and citations to the source.Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright provides some information. It is much better to simply write the text from scratch, in your own words and then reference the source. At the moment, the Superflex article still requires proper referencing to independent reliable sources, but I think the Copyright Violations have been removed. Cheers. — CactusWriter | ^needles 12:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Superflex portray photo nikolai howalt.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Superflex portray photo nikolai howalt.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]