User talk:Feng Jianming

August 2010

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself, as you did at Feng Jianming. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your article contributions, such as the edit you made to Feng Jianming. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wordjim for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Steamroller Assault (talk) 07:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not engage in sock puppetry like you did there again; I have blocked the accounts you have used. If you do that again, then you will have your editing privileges revoked for sock puppetry. Regards, –MuZemike 21:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]