User talk:Felixkrull

McCann

That source is not a reliable one. It violates our living persons policy, so please do not restore it. In addition to that, the issue is already dealt with elsewhere in the article, in this section. SarahSV ^(talk) 02:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please also take this opportunity to review policies on reliable sources and original research. I'd also recommend WP:VNT and WP:Academic bias, as complimentary essays which give a pretty valid outlook of existing policy. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Your personal opinion is all nice, but nobody cares about it unless you can provide acceptable reliable sources to support it; as must have been said a couple of times to you already. Accusing Wikipedia editors of being biased is also borderline uncivil, so I suggest you take some time off and find a less controversial topic. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 11:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As it turned out, I was right. The bias is clear for everyone to see now. Case in point, the government of the UK has been advised that a lab leak is now the most likely origin of covid 19. That was clear all along to anyone who could see through the corruption in some scientific circles. And you don't decide when I take time off, buddy. Felixkrull (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Standard ArbCom sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see the the Political commissars are already lining up behind the front to shoot everyone that steps out of line. :-) That surely will help the discussion along ... Felixkrull (talk) 22:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]