User talk:Felixcatuk

Alex Allan

Good to see someone else is following the story! But have you heard any other news? --Andy Fugard (talk) 09:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No nothing. Curious situation. There were some very odd stories in the press around the same time (phorm, multimillion pound raids on BT exchanges etc). I was intrigued, but pleased to see that he seemed to be recovering. I quite like the bookplate too. Felixcatuk (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS it seems there was a passing mention of Alex Allan in the Sunday Times recently, claiming he attended a Ministerial meeting in January 2009; http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5993156.ece Felixcatuk (talk) 18:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks---shall have a look at that link. --Andy Fugard (talk) 19:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MobileCDN

Hi Stifle

I noticed that you had rejected a speedy deletion for the article about Mobilecdn. This article was authored, and indeed it would seem every update to it has been made, by the CEO of the company concerned. (see https://nodpi.org/forum/index.php/topic,3643.msg35429.html#msg35429, and https://nodpi.org/2011/03/22/phorm-interactive-fraud-and-dan-truax/). Please would you reconsider deletion of the MobileCDN article, or advise how best to proceed given the obvious impact of COI? Should I undo his edits? (... which would probably leave a blank article). Many thanks. Felixcatuk (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was over two years ago; a speedy deletion would not hold up. You should nominate the article for deletion or generously edit it down. Stifle (talk) 23:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]