User talk:Felipemassa123

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sebastian Vettel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Mlpearc MESSAGE 18:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sebastian Vettel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Midgrid (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Sebastian Vettel, you will be blocked from editing. --Midgrid (talk) 18:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Sebastian Vettel. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Midgrid (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NON championchip races of Joakim Bonnier

you son of a bitch you deleted it again stop itt please it belongs to the non ChampionChip races so do not remove it if you do not believe me go to this site http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/archive/f1/title.html and go to the non ChampionChip races and 1960 you will see it. you son of a bitch do not delete it please.

That comment has earned you this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Another death threat. Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, have you seen how many non-championship articles I've written? I know the difference between Formula One and something else. Silhouet show results from various formulae, and a bit of investigation on your part would have told you that the races in question are not F1 races. Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bretonbanquet The non championchip results i made were right so why you deleted them plese do not delete the campiochip result and i wil not kill you it was a joke. I was angry that you deleted it because, I had spent a lot of work in it and I do not want anyone to delete it than. than that really sucks .please do not delete it. check out this website and you will see that I was right about the results of jo.http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/archive/f1/title.html

I've just explained it to you. I use Silhouet all the time, and they show results from many formulae, not just F1. The Australian / NZ / South African races were nearly all Formula Libre, i.e. free for any car to enter. They weren't F1 races. I know you put in a lot of work, we all do. But that doesn't mean you can just edit what you like. If the death threat was a joke, I didn't find it funny, so it was an expensive joke for you. Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The indy 500 also was no formula one it was under American Automobile Association rules The Non championchip rases ehere under formula libre rules but it is part of the non championchionchip chek out the site it is the same like the indy 500 from 1950-1960 but it was under other rules but the 1indy 500 was also part of the worldchampioncip this is the same. so please chek out tis site and not delete it anymore.http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/archive/f1/title.html

Yes, but the Indy 500 was part of the World Championship - that's the only reason we include it. When it stopped being part of the World Championship in 1961, that's where we stop including it. The races you're including, the Australian GP, New Zealand GP, some South African GPs, the Buenos Aires City GP etc were not part of the championship, nor were they run to Formula One regulations. So they don't count. Silhouet is a helpful resource, but it is also anonymous, and not a WP:RS. Silhouet is missing hundreds and hundreds of non-F1 races. Anyway, we don't just copy Silhouet. The only non-Championship races we include on Wikipedia are Formula One races - just for Formula One cars - or Formula One races with a separate class for F5000 or F2 cars, like the 1971 Argentine Grand Prix. Formula Libre was a different thing. The F1 drivers did take part, but they were nothing to do with F1. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:15, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is yhe same like the indu 500 but this is A non championchip race whit formula libre rules it is stil a formula one race moss and bonier and van trips and others were driving a formula one car it is still a formula one race whit formula libre rules it is like a non championcip race whit formula 5000 cars.just understand it. It is a formula one race whit other cars than formula one but it is still a non championcip race like the 1961 Rand Grand Prix where also sport cars were alowed there was no big difference of time. the 1960 cape grand prix. and the 1960 south african grandprix 2 is the same.

I understand it perfectly well, it's you that doesn't understand it. They were not Formula One races - they had all kinds of cars involved, including cars with much bigger engines. We cannot start to include any old race that had some Formula One cars in it - there were literally hundreds and hundreds of them, not just the few that Silhouet shows. The 1961 Rand GP included cars which conformed to South African F1 regulations, which did include closed sports-car bodies. But the second 1960 South African GP was Formula Libre, and included cars with huge Chevrolet engines, Jaguar engines, and old (big) Climax engines, (like the Tasman Series - we don't include that either), and even a Maserati 200S. That's the difference - allowing a sports car body is not like allowing oversize engines. Incidentally, the closed-body cars run in the Rand GP were far slower than the F1 cars. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:52, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Screw you chek out the site http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/archive/f1/nc/1960/1960.html And read well the non cha,pionchip races 1960 or do you need glasses.

I've told you three times I use that site all the time, but you just don't get it. Then when you lose an argument, you resort to comments like that, and that's why you are deservedly blocked. If you start editing with your IP, that will get blocked as well for sockpuppetry. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All the races are part of the non championchip races but whit formula libre rules or australian rules so it is part of the non championchip races.

No. We're talking about non-championship Formula One, not non-championship anything else. Or do you want to include every race ever run? Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The races are formula one non championchip races with other rules just like de indianapolis 500

That makes no sense. I've explained this to you already, I'm not explaining it again. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about a compromie

How is that a compromise? That's just your version with the Formula Libre results. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is just a formula one non championchip race whit and witout formula one rules the australian gp was part in the 1950 non championchip races and in 1960 it is just the same. The same with the 1960 Grande Premio do Rio de Janeiro 1960 Cape Grand Prix 1960 South African Grand Prix 2 1960 New Zealand Grand Prix

I don't know why I'm bothering to explain this again. Here -

South Africa 1960 [1] see where it says The first modern South African GP took place there in 1960 and was run to Formula Libre regulations - as racing cars were scarce.

New Zealand [2] There were so few racing cars in New Zealand that, until 1964, all major events were held under ‘Formula Libre’ rules, with no limits on engine size, fuel type, car weight, or design.

Buenos Aires [3] In 1960 the Cordoba track hosted a Formula Libre "Grand Prix" in 1960, won by Maurice Trintignant in a Cooper-Climax.

Australia - see here that it was Formula Libre in the early 1960s.

None of these races were Formula One and these tables are only for Formula One results. I don't know how to make it any clearer. What do you mean "part of the non-championship"? That makes no sense. If it doesn't run to F1 rules, how the hell is it an F1 race? Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't geting it aren't you Still it is formula one non championchip races under formula libre rules but is was a formula one race under formula rules are you getting it

I'm done here. If you think a race held under non-F1 rules can still be an F1 race, then I can't help you. I doubt anyone else can either. It's like saying a marathon is the same as the 100m, just under different rules. Madness. Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem it is jo bonnier's Non championchip races not Non formula one cahmpionchip Thus, it should be there to

I'm really not the one with the problem here. You can't see that the non-championship results are part of the "Formula One" section? No other results will be allowed, so there's no point in banging on about it. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then I will except it

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Felipemassa123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because i didn't ment it it was a joke so i will not do it again.

Decline reason:

I don't find death threats funny. People who make them do not get second chances. Sandstein 17:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Felipemassa123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here

Decline reason:

The fact that is what you do when angry is the entire problem. - Vianello (Talk) 22:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Iwas angry to that person so i sad i whoul kill him i didn't ment that i was trying to explane somthing to him and he didn't listen so i became angry I didn't ment it

I'll like to be unblock'd because i want to make new pages on wikipedia and i'll not say nogthy things to anyone and i will not say i will kill somewone anymore that wase because i was angry i didn't ment that. I hope i can make new pages on wikipedia soon

I'll not do anything wrong again

blocked

If you can't edit here without threatening to kill someone, then I suspect Wikipedia is not the proper place for you to be. When you've calmed down and can discuss things rationally, the {{unblock}} template is available. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

can anywone tell me how to unblock myself i made a joke and i dont want to kill anywone can anywone tell me please

As it says right above your question (and also in the block message you see when you try to edit), use the {{unblock}} template, explaining why you think the block should be lifted. I would lift it now myself, except I note that even while blocked, you are saying things like "screw you" to someone who is patiently trying to explain things. So I'll let you use the unblock template, and have another admin review instead. Note to reviewing admin: No need to talk to me, I'm fine with whatever you decide. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I sad Srew you because i was angry he just dont understand what i'm trying to say You also can see that i'm right see the site http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/archive/f1/title.html Reed this well Non-Championship F1 Races In parallel with the early World Championship Formula 1 series, there were many non-championship races held in many countries. Towards the end of the 1960s these races started to die out, although the Race of Champions lasted until 1983. What follows is the most complete results for each year that I have. They are not comprehensive, and I hope to add further to them as time progresses. This is the same by what is an the site

Who wrote that? How on earth is that reliable? In any case, it does not say that all the races were F1 races. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone tell me how to unblock me i will not say anyting angry or things like that and i didn't ment the tings i was angry because he didn't listen to me.

Can anyone unblock me please

For the third time, use the {{unblock}} template to request another admin review this block. Type {{unblock|1=your reason for being unblocked}}. You may want to read WP:Guide to appealing blocks first. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not getting it

I don't know I can make it simpler. From WP:Guide to appealing blocks, which I have a feeling you did not read:

"To make an unblock request, copy the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here}}. Don't forget to insert your own reason."

If you still don't understand, you can email your request to the following: unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not getting that either

It's not rocket science, here I'll tell you what to copy and paste {{Unblock|1='''INSERT WHY YOU SHOULD BE UNBLOCK RIGHT HERE'''}}--SKATER ^Speak. 22:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please

unblock me