User talk:Feetlvr

Welcome!

Hi Feetlvr! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mahabharata into Historicity of the Mahabharata. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feetlvr, please provide attribution for every edit in which you copy content from another article. This edit was missing attribution; it's still needed even though you attributed a previous edit. Please also be sure you are linking the correct title of the article (see [1]). Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 02:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was copied from Rama, not from Ramayana as you indicated. Please slow down and take more care to ensure that you are accurately providing attribution. DanCherek (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DanCherek Thanks, and duly noted. I am new to editing in wikipedia, and am still learning things. I will be careful when attributing as well as while making any other contributions. Apologies and Thank you once again.Feetlvr (talk) 04:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagavad Gita. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 04:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Historicity of the Mahabharata, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 13:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Historicity of the Mahabharata. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 13:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok Feetlvr (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't wish to get blocked please stop making unconstructive edits in articles :D Help the community with constructive edits that are useful and then you're in the clear. Thanks :D ItzAviqn (talk) 14:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]