User talk:Federica Viazzi (BEIC)
Ways to improve Adam Lintz
[edit]Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Federica Viazzi (BEIC), thanks for creating Adam Lintz!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Your article seems to have no body text at all. Adding some may make the article a bit more clear.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons Talk 15:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi and thank you Rasimmons, I will search other references about Lintz and as soon as poossible I'm going to improve. Best wishes. --Federica Viazzi (BEIC) (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for creating this. Can you expand this a bit? An article has to state why the subject is notable (WP:N]). Otherwise it may be deleted due to lack of stated importance. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: That 16th-century mathematician? I cannot agree. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 09:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- I expanded the article, he was a "well known student of Melanchton" and a notable writer. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 10:52, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Marco Chemello (BEIC): Thank you for the expansion. I am not sure what you are not agreeing with, I was just trying to point out to the editor here that one-sentence articles are a bit too short, and adding a few sentences explaining their significance is a very good idea. Short articles that don't state why the subject are important could end up deleted, and that's not what we would want, right? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you @Piotrus: for explaining your point. I agree that every article should have enough informations. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 08:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
[edit]Thank you for your recent articles, including Joannes Sturmius Mechlinianus, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Giuseppe Suzzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable academic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Stanisław Solski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable academic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Charles de Loys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable academic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Jan Vaerman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable academic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Federica Viazzi (BEIC). Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Federica Viazzi (BEIC). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Adam Lintz
[edit]
Hello, Federica Viazzi (BEIC). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adam Lintz".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)