User talk:Federalwafer

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Flag of Antarctica, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Midwinter Day

I appreciate the expansion of the article, though I am confused at your removal of information. Everything in that article was sourced, so could you explain why you removed it please? Serendi ^podous 07:23, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Serendipodous: Thank you for creating the article! Much of the information in the article was correctly sourced, so I removed only those parts with errors. Some sources themselves were outdated (e.g. there are now winter flights to sites like McMurdo Station so shipping materials and ingredients for Midwinter celebrations is now possible.) Some sections were misinterpretations of the source material (e.g. People in Antarctica during winter are exclusively at scientific stations, but they are not exclusively scientific personnel and they are not the only people to celebrate Midwinter Day.) In other sections, the referenced material did not mention the topic for which it was cited (e.g. There were no mentions of horror films in the Antarctic Sun article.) Federalwafer (talk) 13:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reference to "The Thing" (and running naked) was in the BBC broadcast article. The referece to "The Shining" was in the antarctic sun article. You also removed sourced statements that people give and receive gifts on Midwinter and that consuming the local wildlife is no longer legal. Is that no longer true? Serendi ^podous 13:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying, @Serendipodous:. I've restored the mentions of horror films, streaking, consuming local wildlife and re-added a mention of Midwinter gifts. Thank you. Federalwafer (talk) 14:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antarctica Day has been accepted

Antarctica Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Antarctic gateway cities

On 14 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Antarctic gateway cities, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that almost everyone and everything that travels to Antarctica has to travel through one of five gateway cities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Antarctic gateway cities. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Antarctic gateway cities), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 11,298 views (941.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work!

the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]