User talk:Fearsear

July 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nickelodeon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nickelodeon was changed by Fearsear (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868725 on 2015-07-20T19:49:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm JustBerry. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hot & Bothered because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JustBerry (talk) 23:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits from September 27 and 28, 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. i'm sorry

Your edit on Life in Pieces

Hi Fearsear, I noticed that in this edit you added "Small Dog Picture Company" to the infobox for Life in Pieces.

However, I don't see this company listed at the end of the episodes (but the other three are). Where do you have this information from? Note that information added to Wikipedia must have reliable sources which are included as citation. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. –Dark Cocoa Frosting (talk) 10:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Amazon.com

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Amazon.com article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Ian (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zootopia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 06:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Moana (2016 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carniolus (talk) 06:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop adding or changing content, as you did to 2016–17 United States network television schedule. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term sneaky vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 16:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fearsear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Good Place and Taken have been pickup to series on NBC Next Year Fearsear (talk) 01:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fearsear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for putting up pilots

Decline reason:

That's only part of the problem. Going through your contributions I find many that simply don't seem to be true. If they are - well, you were warned about citing sources many, many times before. Claiming that pilots are series is an indication of your loose commitment to accuracy. Huon (talk) 14:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fearsear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 00:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fearsear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for long term sneaky vandalisim, can you unblock me and keep edit wikipedia please

Decline reason:

You need to convince us you understand why your actions were disruptive and how you would counteract them. As you have failed to answer this despite several problems, I'm turning access to your talk page off, which means you will need to file a request via the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fearsear. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]