User talk:Fcalculators

1a

Thanks for your edits. It needs a good run-through, and I haven't had a chance. Are you going to post something on your user page—even a single sentence—so the links to it don't show up red everywhere? Tony (talk) 04:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Formula Calculators.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Formula Calculators.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Formula Calculators.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Formula Calculators.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Accessory Calculator.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Accessory Calculator.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Accessory Calculator.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Accessory Calculator.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:FC Scientific.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:FC Scientific.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 03:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:FC Scientific.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:FC Scientific.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:FC Scientific.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FC Scientific.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Scientific.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Scientific.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. When you recently edited Introduction to Cloud computing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Computer room and Virtual server (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to cloud computing

The consensus at Talk:Cloud_computing#Introduction_to_Cloud_computing is to have one article on cloud computing. Cloud computing has been improved significantly over the past couple months such that to my eye, it is now a better introduction to the topic. I am looking for suggestions at to how to incorporate content from Introduction to cloud computing into Cloud computing. --Kvng (talk) 22:28, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what user:junkcops was trying to do but you have reverted it. The article will still be deleted in a few days unless you or someone else takes further action. Let me know if you have any questions. --Kvng (talk) 13:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not responding to your message earlier. This is a part-time activity for me, and I hadn’t logged in for a while.

I reverted the edits because they seemed to be too early – the Banner says that the article may be deleted after 7 days, unless anyone objects. I was preparing a considered response to be made before the 7 days was up, but my hand has been forced and I have objected to the deletion by removing the Banner. I see from the instructions that removal is the minimum response required, and that I am not obliged to do anything else. However, I intend to respond as I said in the revert-edit comment by adding to the Talk pages, but I hope I can take a bit of time now to do this properly.

The Deletion Banner said that the article contained material of dubious quality/reliability. This isn’t consistent with the ratings at the foot of the article - 4.3 for Trustworthiness and 4s for everything else.

Can you please make comments on the Introduction Talk page concerning any specific concerns you have with the article? Fcalculators (talk) 06:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion has thus far occurred at Talk:Cloud_computing#Introduction_to_Cloud_computing. I have added a summary with links to Talk:Introduction_to_cloud_computing#Merge.2Fdelete_proposal. --Kvng (talk) 14:24, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm waiting for your promised justification for keeping this article. Have I missed it? --Kvng (talk) 04:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Introduction to cloud computing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Introduction to cloud computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Introduction to cloud computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sorry for late notification. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FC Arithmetic.JPG

The file File:FC Arithmetic.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]