User talk:Fba-warrior

Welcome!

Hello, Fba-warrior, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Foundational Black Americans did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 17:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Foundational Black Americans. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit log shows you tried to remove this three times, failing twice. Don’t do this ag. Doug Weller talk 17:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Foundational Black Americans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Foundational Black Americans, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 10:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these edits seem to have been biased by you and the editors. For example, you said that the "rally 4 reparations" wasn't annual? what is your basis for saying that? Its happened every year since 2020 i believe. The had another rally this past weekend in Washington dc. Fba-warrior (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Fba-warrior! Your additions to Foundational Black Americans have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Fba-warrior. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 12.75.41.67 (talk) 21:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an advertisement or some kind of promotion. What is the product being promoted? The page was purely informational and full of insight on the sub-group of black americans. Fba-warrior (talk) 13:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You added a site selling t-shirts and hats as a source about American history. You added it repeatedly. FBA is in your account name, as well as the name of the t-shirt website you used as a source. 12.75.41.35 (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"T shirt site"? Please help me understand what you are refereinf to? the official fba wensite? Fba-warrior (talk) 12:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They have denied it, drop it. Slatersteven (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't disclose your relationship with the FBA or its websites, I'll have to block you.

I see you've never responded to posts here. Doug Weller talk 10:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no formal relationship. I have done a case study on them for the last two years. Fba-warrior (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CN

Tags have to have a date, it would be wp:vandalism to remove please do not do so again. Slatersteven (talk) 13:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SPA

And please read wp:spa. Slatersteven (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately you didnt read the article correctly. one is a black american flag and the other is a foundational back American flag Fba-warrior (talk) 14:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"FBAs have two flags.", the one you want to use it as a source for is "The second flag", but here you go their own website https://officialfba.com/ "The FBA Nation Maroon Flag commemorates the legacy of Foundational Black American maroons who fought for freedom in America during the formal slavery era.", they have two flags. Slatersteven (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this does not explain why you are an SPA, or refute it. Slatersteven (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Slatersteven (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are edit warring again stop. Slatersteven (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Fijiwahwah per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fijiwahwah. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 00:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]