User talk:Fawadlodhi20000

Your edit

Are you the IP that was edit warring on Lodi dynasty? --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have answered your questions in Lodi dynasty talk page, Undue weightage given to dynasty Fawadlodhi20000 (talk) 22:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the third or fourth time, you can't just add stuff in the middle of a discussion. Add it down below if you must. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added a new topic, don't know when I replied to you, reply in Lodi Talk page Fawadlodhi20000 (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lodi dynasty talk page* Fawadlodhi20000 (talk) 20:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied to you in new topic Undue weight of Dynasty Fawadlodhi20000 (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fawadlodhi20000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Please show what I am editing to block me, have only been using talk for a while now Fawadlodhi20000 (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, you have been disruptive on the talk page of the topic you seem interested in, and treating it as a battleground. You won't be unblocked to edit about that topic further, so please tell what edits you will make instead. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fawadlodhi20000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Tired of being villified, would be grateful to write on Delhi Sultanate so wanted unblock

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fawadlodhi20000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Has read and learnt how to use Wikipedia, will not find me disruptive in talk, reason I was blocked Fawadlodhi20000 (talk) 04:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is borderline incoherent and indicates you lack sufficient understanding of written English to contribute here. See WP:CIR. Yamla (talk) 11:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.