User talk:Faw Q.

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Toronto Vegetarian Association has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Donald Duck (talk) 03:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources required

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Toronto Vegetarian Association. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 02:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto Vegetarian Association talk page

Please see my comments on the Toronto Vegetarian Association talk page regarding your recent edits. Thank you. David R Alexander (talk) 04:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have tried often enough now to insert that bit of news to Toronto Vegetarian Association. You haven't responded on the talk page, and many an editor has pointed out that the content is not encyclopedic. Besides not being neutral, there's the matter of Wikipedia not being a newspaper. Please do not reinsert it again. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:40, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Toronto Vegetarian Association. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Many different templates would have applied, as has been noted by others on this talk page--not adhering to neutral point of view, improper verification, etc. One aspect is clear: this edit is intended to enhance the status of the organization, one way or another, and that is not what Wikipedia is for. Adding this information is highly disruptive by now, and if you persist you might find yourself blocked. Drmies (talk) 02:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 03:13, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Toronto Vegetarian Association, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 15:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:13, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for username and editwarring. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]