User talk:Fattythefatbear

February 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 04:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fattythefatbear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done absolutely nothing wrong. I have every intention of helping the dictionary grow. Why did you delete my page? Fattythefatbear (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. If you don't understand why that page was deleted, this is not the project for you, per WP:COMPETENCE. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fattythefatbear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can someone explain to me constructively why I was deleted? I can't figure it out.

Decline reason:

Of the three pages that were deleted, one was an unreferenced biography of an apparently non-notable youth deleted via speedy deletion criterion A7, the second contained no meaningful content and was deleted via criterion A3, the third was an insult deleted as obvious vandalism. Huon (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked for repeated vandalism and personal attacks (and now it looks like you're engaged in sockpuppetry). Your block has nothing to do with your almost zero-content article. You should probably be addressing the former, not the latter. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:48, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2015 New England Revolution season

Hello Fattythefatbear,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2015 New England Revolution season for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tigraan (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPI notice

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Freddythemushroom. Thank you. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]