User talk:Fathima Joseph

Welcome!

Hello, Fathima Joseph, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Eldho Rajan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Daiyusha (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eldho Rajan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eldho Rajan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason?

what is the point for the speedy deletion or the reason? what is the content done by eldho rajan without any cause? what is the real problem from Wikipedia?

Editing logged out

Hi. Please don't log out to remove speedy deletion tags. Wikipedia is also not the right place to write about oneself. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that you cannot create a new account to circumwent the block on your former account Eldhorajan92, you would first have to request an unblock on your original account. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

that is not a question about that, this is my wish! Fathima Joseph (talk) 09:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having an article on wikipedia

Hi, for a person to have an article, he should usually have multiple news articles written about him at the least. In your case, all your sources are Facebook pages, that is not enough. You should also realize that Wikipedia is not a blog or your own personal web space where you can write to advertise yourself. I'd recommend sticking to wixsite, blogpost and Facebook.

Daiyusha (talk) 12:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

where did say that? I give the information what Iam do? and with the information of my website then go to legal way, not to this unnecessary comments Fathima Joseph (talk) 12:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No one's going legal way, the worst thing that can happen to you is you will get blocked on Wikipedia. No one is filing a case on you. All I'm saying is the content you are trying to put in is not eligible. There are rules in place, See Here WP:GNG. Daiyusha (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eldho Rajan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eldho Rajan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 13:04, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to St. Mary's Cathedral, Kundara. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:36, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it against any Wikipedia law? Fathima Joseph (talk) 13:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is against a Wikipedia "rule". WP:LINK. Its a private site, and it has its rules. I would suggest you follow it as to not get banned.Daiyusha (talk) 16:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Eldho Rajan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Eldho Rajan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TAXIDICAE💰 16:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what is the reason point of speedy deletion, as the reference content! Fathima Joseph (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When you were blocked on your alternate account, did you think that was somehow a free license to create a new one and evade said block? TAXIDICAE💰 17:14, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts and articles are different! what is the purpose to ask for my account? Fathima Joseph (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked from editing mainspace because of this exact problematic behavior on your other account. That means you as a person are prohibited from editing on any account or IP address in the areas you are blocked from. TAXIDICAE💰 17:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The person is not related to the article who create it? this is an article about information for the purpose for the people. Fathima Joseph (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Eldhorajan92 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eldhorajan92. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 19:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]