User talk:Fatekhan

Speedy deletion of Zeakon Zarwali Zone

A tag has been placed on Zeakon Zarwali Zone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Steve Crossin (talk) 05:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zeakon Zarwali Zone has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Edison (talk) 05:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Edison (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Best1414 Test1515 Rest2020 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Edison (talk) 05:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis and Palmer Financial Advisors LLC

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alexis and Palmer Financial Advisors LLC, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.alexis-palmer.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Best1414 Test1515 Rest2020, you will be blocked from editing. Edison (talk) 06:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rb.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Rb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Alexis Texas.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Alexis Texas.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Alexis Texas, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Defining who has the "best" ass is hardly neutral. BananaFiend (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alexis Texas

I have nominated Alexis Texas, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Texas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MRK University

The article MRK University has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2008. No evidence that it exists. MRKU is established in India but I can’t find any refs to support an entity in Afghanistan.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 09:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]