User talk:Fastnfurios

Ahobila Mutt

For your kind information, Ahobila Mutt is again a "concerned party source". This is why i've repeatedly stressed on neutral party(non-srivaishnava) sources. That is how it is categorized under wikipedia. Unless you can suppost your claim with neutral party refs, it's not a valid wiki edit. By the way, i'm taking this matter(your code of conduct) to wikiquette for placing a template(though i haven't violated any of wiki editorial policies), and for making mischievous reverts(removing other sources and contribs) based on the ahobila mutt edit comment. I'm sorry but you've invited this upon yourself. Hari7478 (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your second misconduct - spamming my talk page with same warnings(especially when i've not violated wiki policies). Hari7478 (talk) 21:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:39, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message for you

Hi, i just now read thru the page which you provided on Iyengar talk page on the 5th Jeeyer. Had previously read an other paper on the issue. I empathize with what you feel. However, please look at it this way. Before the split (amongst Ramanuja's followers), there was no Vadakalai or Thenkalai community. All followers of Ramanuja sampradaya were within one brotherhood. If one were to keep philosophical reasons for the sectarian schism aside, and accept both sects were one during the time of Ramanuja, then the current Vadakalai-Thenkalai issues with regard to issues you raised will not exist. Why not both sects keep their establishments and sectarian differences aside; and view themselves as one vaishnava brotherhood. Hope you will appreciate the message behind this point (isn't that what Ramanuja wud have liked after all). Thanks. --= No ||| Illusion = (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Mayasutra[reply]