User talk:FascistCommandantToBeLookedUpTo
|
May 2011
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at East Coast – West Coast hip hop rivalry with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeairn (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Username
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (FascistCommandantToBeLookedUpTo) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you.
The notifier has not provided a reason why this username may not meet Wikipedia's username policy. Incorrect notifications must be removed. If you know that your username does not violate our policy, please remove the message and leave a note on the notifier's talk page. |
--Salix (talk): 21:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to East Coast – West Coast hip hop rivalry. Mephtalk 21:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. June 2011
[edit]This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of surviving veterans of World War I, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not do that again without consensus -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- Logical justification for my edit contribution was supplied in the edit summary, bully. You are directed to avail the talk venue for the article as a first resort and now you are to be held to account for the abuse of avoiding that step and making false accusation of vandalism.
- Read the talk page and all the arguments there, which have been going on for a long time, and do not redirect the page again against consensus -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:35, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- And I will block you if you do it again -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hut 8.5 20:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC) |
FascistCommandantToBeLookedUpTo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Proper investigation has not been undertaken; unblock unless and until that is attempted
Decline reason:
Confirmed by CheckUser as a sock puppet of SuperblySpiffingPerson (talk · contribs) Talk page editing access revoked. Banned means banned, SuperblySpiffingPerson, and you know better. –MuZemike 22:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.