User talk:Farmer84

June 2021

Hello, I'm Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Grace, Idaho—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Plandu (talk) 19:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grace, Idaho. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Grace, Idaho was changed by Farmer84 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864335 on 2021-06-11T19:34:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Or what? Farmer84 (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Grace, Idaho, you may be blocked from editing. Plandu (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The guy is a RINO, I’m just letting people know about it Farmer84 (talk) 19:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You want truth on here, right? That is the most true statement about that individual ever. Farmer84 (talk) 19:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Grace, Idaho. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why block me? The things I’m adding are true, don’t you want truth on this site? Farmer84 (talk) 22:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If people were allowed to just put whatever we thought about politicians in articles here, trust me, they'd look a lot different. Alas, statements need reliable references to independent sources. jp×g 22:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To give you an example a few minutes apart from your edit, this is someone else's opinion of Robert Moses, which I also reverted. jp×g 22:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please, you people won’t allow anything that goes against your liberal agenda. Farmer84 (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I care a lot about Wikipedia, and what I don't want is for you to sit around badmouthing Wikipedia because all the liberals here blocked you from "saying the truth". I looked for one reliable source to support your claim that Gibbs is a RINO, and found only this source, where Gibbs himself discusses it. If I had found a source to support your claim, and it was notable enough to add to his article, I would have helped you. But right now it's just you being angry at the elected politician, and venting your frustration by adding unsupported gossip, which Wikipedia does not permit. Wikipedia is not censored, and you can add just about anything here so long as you have a reliable source to support it. Without that, you're just adding defamatory comments, and that's not permitted. Me a liberal. Jesus. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 04:42, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]