User talk:FarmGirlRR4

This is FarmGirlRR4's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:FarmGirlRR4/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FarmGirlRR4! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You again made an edit concerning content related to a living person (Kristin Goodwin), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning verification and how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on that article's talk page. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 17:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fourthords, what documentation would need to accompany.... She divorced and remarried. 174.24.101.40 (talk) 18:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. my point..... FarmGirlRR4 (talk) 19:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:FarmGirlRR4/sandbox

Hello, FarmGirlRR4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:FarmGirlRR4/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:FarmGirlRR4/sandbox

Hello, FarmGirlRR4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kristin Goodwin, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The verifiability policy explains that, "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Please feel welcome to follow-up on your previous initial discussion the article's talk page. In the meantime, your unsourced changes have been reverted. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 21:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kristin Goodwin. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 23:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While Wesoree is correct in reverting the edits made, I am more-specifically and more-accurately explaining their impropriety at that article's talk page (though give me a few minutes to finish typing them up, please). — Fourthords | =Λ= | 23:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]