User talk:Farhtcunnt

August 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Special Olympics World Games. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nerilie Abram. Railfan23 (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. -- Deep fried okra 03:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Farhtcunnt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was merely trying to improve the encyclopedic tone in the articles I edited and I think it was unfair that I was blocked without someone explaining exactly what I did wrong. Furthermore, I would have been happy to discuss changing my username to something else, if an editor found it to be offensive. Farhtcunnt (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User including links to pornographic sites in their unblock request. Reblocked with talk page access removed. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your inclusion of a link to a porn site in your {{unblock}} request makes it abundantly clear that you are not taking this issue seriously and that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. General Ization ^Talk 05:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TBH, I think that if you thought you were editing constructively, you have a WP:CIR problem. The porn link in the unblock request does nothing to change my my opinion.-- Deep fried okra 05:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]