User talk:Farhad2010

Welcome!

Hello, Farhad2010! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Zach Vega (talk to me) 19:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Davod Farhadi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Davod Farhadi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Florence (talk) 21:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

??

@Dennis Brown: Can I edit with this account?--Farhad2010 (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

my password(farhad2016) has error.why?--Farhad2010 (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock reviewed

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Farhad2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not use politics of unlike Sock puppetry. you can check it.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Huon (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Farhad2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not use politics of unlike Sock puppetry. you can check it.--Farhad2010 (talk) 19:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It was checked. You will need to explain this. Huon (talk) 19:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Huon: Hello. I talk that I didn't use of its in En-wiki. My english is poor.--Farhad2010 (talk) 19:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Good Huon and cute, please open my account.Thank u.--Farhad2010 (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. You used multiple accounts in ways not permitted by policy. You have not addressed that. There may also be language issues; some basic competence is required to edit the English Wikipedia successfully. Huon (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Thank u. I didn't know it has a problem. But I have Competence! Thank u cute Huon.--Farhad2010 (talk) 20:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: I think you are very kind. --Farhad2010 (talk) 20:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock reviewed

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Farhad2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't use My accounts in english wiki.I use Its in fa-wiki.--Farhad2010 (talk) 3:33 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

That is not true - both User:Farhad2016 and User:FarhadFarhad2016 edited here. GAB^gab 01:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@GeneralizationsAreBad: Hello .Has alternative accounts problems? I didn't know.--Farhad2010 (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralizationsAreBad: You have alternative accounts( GeneralizationsAreGood, GeneralizationsAreMobile), too. Is it only bad for me?--Farhad2010 (talk) 04:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SOCK. Some uses of alternative accounts are permitted, but many others are not. In particular, block evasion is not permitted. Huon (talk) 06:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Thank u. Cute Huon and kind, I never don't block evasion in enwiki. I just had alternative account. I really don't konow that why my acount is block?? --Farhad2010 (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You used one of those "alternative accounts" to ask why you had been blocked. So you continued to edit despite having been blocked, knowingly evading the block. Huon (talk) 19:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Thank u. Cute Huon and kind, I didn't know...

@Huon: Cute Huon and kind: Oh yes, I remembered. At that time, my main account (Farhad2010) was closed incorrect and alternative account (Farhad2016), (which the CheckUser had assumed was the main account) was open. So I wanted to ask my main account was wrong. At this time, the account (Farhad2016) was closed globally (this) by the single man (Mardetanha) and I inevitably made the account (Farhad2016 2016). --Farhad2010 (talk) 13:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the English Wikipedia, Farhad2010 and Farhad2016 were blocked within the same minute. Farhad2016 had been globally locked, your main account wasn't (and isn't). Farhad2010 and Farhad2016 edited the English Wikipedia in ways not permitted by our policy. There was nothing "incorrect" about the blocks on the English Wikipedia. And there definitely was nothing "inevitable" about the creation of a new account when those two were blocked. Huon (talk) 18:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Thank u for answer. Cute Huon and kind, You must have understood my problem so far. What solution do you think? Are you ready to help me with this? As you know, I've accepted my mistake. Thank u very much.--Farhad2010 (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I do not think your command of English is good enough to successfully contribute to the English Wikipedia. Two examples: Firstly, throughout this conversation you have made false statements about your conduct and history. The most charitable explanation is that there are language issues. Secondly, if someone with a good command of English called me "cute", I would assume they'd try to belittle me. Huon (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Thank u. Oh, I didn't know "cute" meaning "belittle". I read it in your account page. But I am trying to strengthen my English language. As I didn't walk when I was born, then I learned with the help of the my parents. This is our world that we must try to learn new somethings every day. Thank u very much kind Huon.--Farhad2010 (talk) 19:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid a misunderstanding: "Cute" does not mean "belittle". It's a word used to refer to infants and small or cuddly animals. I assumed you saw it on my user page where I use it in the caption of a papercut of myself as a child. I was cute back then (if I say so myself). I'm not a small child any more. You use words without knowing what they mean. Wikipedia is not a language course. Huon (talk) 20:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll be more careful.--Farhad2010 (talk) 21:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Farhad2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

According to the discussion above.--Farhad2010 (talk) 16:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but your command of English is nowhere near sufficient to contribute to the English language Wikipedia right now, so I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page as further unblock requests have little chance of success at this time. I suggest you stick to the Wikipedia in your native language for now. If you continue with your English studies and your abilities in the language improve after some time to the extent that you can make a detailed and convincing unblock request, please contact WP:UTRS and ask for your talk page privileges to be reinstated. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 04:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.