User talk:Fannybriceii

February 2022

Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Murder of Dora Bloch—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 23:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi glane23,

i was surprised (& dismayed) to see that you'd removed my revisions to the above page because they did "not appear constructive" to you. i disagree with you. in 1976 when dora was murdered, she was perceived simply as an unfortunate old woman. but this p.m., while doing some research, i ran across a family tree on the following page on avshalom feinberg in hebrew: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%90%D7%91%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9D_%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%91%D7%A8%D7%92 & discovered the facts that i addded to the dora bloch site. i thought it was fascinating information and feel that other wiki readers might think so, too. it makes dora not just one more person murdered by terrorists but a person with an historical past, closely linked to the land of israel and the state of israel.

& even if you don't think the connection with avshalom feinberg and his father is constructive, why remove the links i made to hebrew wiki pages? i've often seen such links, have made some myself, & see no reason not to. if the entity involved has no page in one language but does have a page in another, why not point it out? the worst thing that can happen is that someone won't be interested...

i'd like to ask you to reconsider your edit. i'd appreciate it.

thanks, Fannybriceii Fannybriceii (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Fannybriceii (talk) 12:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Hannah Primrose, Countess of Rosebery for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Ravenswing 02:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]