Jump to content

User talk:Fannnypack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fannnypack, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Fannnypack! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Fannnypack, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


PPD

[edit]

Hi! I wanted to give you and your group a bit of a note - your work so far looks good, but make sure that you take as much of a global perspective on things as you can, to avoid this focusing too predominantly on how PPD is handled in the United States. Otherwise this looks good. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oh - another note. With the infanticide article, be careful of statements like "However, with clinical research continuing to demonstrate the large role of rapid neurochemical fluctuation in postpartum psychosis, prevention of infanticide points ever strongly towards psychiatric intervention.". While the supplied sources does seem to point to this, making this statement will likely be seen as original research, as it will be seen as an interpretation of the given sources. Something like this should be attributed to the person making the claim and have the given citation listed after it. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:51, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]